Test Rover Suspension and Route Control for SDS Actor Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing test technologies for self-driving systems are inefficient and incompatible with simulation software, requiring manual control and causing damage to other systems and actors during physical testing, and lack integration with SDS hardware and software.

Innovation Solution

A test rover apparatus with a chassis, wheels, and suspension system that can be remotely controlled to simulate mobile actors, integrating with self-driving system (SDS) hardware and software, and capable of receiving predetermined routes based on simulation data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual control is used during physical testing, then testing can be performed, but testing efficiency is low and manual intervention is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidmanual control requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The test rover is equipped with autonomous navigation capabilities including sensors (cameras, LIDAR, GPS) and onboard processors that enable it to independently follow pre-programmed routes and perform maneuvers without continuous manual control, allowing the system to serve itself during testing operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical control is replaced with automated electronic control systems including motor controllers, sensor feedback loops, and software-based navigation algorithms that automatically adjust the rover's movement based on pre-programmed test scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If physical testing is conducted with existing test technologies, then sensor performance can be validated, but physical damage may occur to systems and actors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor performance validationVSAvoidphysical damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The test rover creates realistic copies of mobile actors (pedestrians, cyclists, vehicles) using scaled models or simplified representations that replicate the optical, radar, and LIDAR signatures of real actors, allowing sensor validation without the risks associated with using actual actors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements pre-programmed safety protocols and controlled test environments where test scenarios are carefully planned and limited to predetermined routes and maneuvers, cushioning against potential physical damage before it can occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Adaptability or versatility

If existing test technologies are used, then testing can be performed, but integration with SDS hardware and software is lacking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSDS integration capabilityVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The test rover is designed as a multi-functional platform that can simulate various types of mobile actors (pedestrians, cyclists, vehicles) and can be programmed to perform different maneuvers and routes, making it universally applicable to test various SDS sensor configurations and algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The test rover serves as an intermediary device between the SDS system and the physical environment, translating virtual test scenarios into physical movements and translating sensor responses back into measurable data, thereby bridging the gap between simulation and real-world testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances testing efficiency by allowing remote control of simulated actors, reducing manual intervention, and validating sensor and software performance without physical damage.

Implementation Method 1

At least one spring is coupled between the at least one wheel and the chassis and configured to: bias the at least one wheel to extend out of the cavity to engage an underlying surface, and compress in response to a load being applied to the top of the chassis thereby retracting the at least one wheel into the cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS12374168B2Test rover apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12374168B2 patent drawing
  • US12374168B2 patent drawing
  • US12374168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a test rover apparatus, a test system and a test method using the test rover apparatus. For example, the test rover apparatus is provided with a chassis that is configured to support an object representing a mobile actor, and a motor that is coupled to at least one wheel. At least one spring is coupled between the at least one wheel and the chassis to: bias the at least one wheel to extend out of the cavity to engage an underlying surface, and compress in response to a load being applied to the top of the chassis thereby retracting the at least one wheel into the cavity. A controller is configured to control the motor to drive the at least one wheel to propel the chassis along a predetermined route that is based on simulation data and corresponds to a maneuver of the mobile actor.