Tester Device Error Source Identification via UPnP Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for identifying the source of errors in customer devices, such as signal interference or outdated software, often rely on external devices that operate differently and require multiple tools, leading to reduced accuracy and increased time for diagnosis.

Innovation Solution

A tester device that directly receives information from the customer device, using protocols like UPnP and OMA DM, to analyze and identify errors, thereby reducing the need for external devices and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If external devices are used to identify error sources, then diagnostic coverage can be extended, but measurement precision deteriorates due to operational differences between external and customer devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic coverageVSAvoiderror identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The customer device performs self-diagnosis by executing diagnostic code locally and generating test results internally. This self-service approach ensures that the device under test evaluates its own operations using its native components, thereby maintaining measurement precision while achieving comprehensive diagnostic coverage through automated self-assessment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using external devices to test the customer device, the invention inverts the testing paradigm by having the customer device test itself through embedded diagnostic code. This inversion resolves the contradiction by ensuring that the same device used for operation is also used for testing, eliminating operational differences that would compromise measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple external devices are used for comprehensive testing, then diagnostic capability is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capabilityVSAvoidnumber of external devices
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The customer device is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the operational device and as its own testing instrument. By embedding diagnostic code within the customer device itself, the system eliminates the need for multiple external testing devices, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining comprehensive testing capability through the device's dual role.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention merges the customer device and the testing device into a single integrated system. The diagnostic code is embedded within the customer device, combining the functions of operation and testing in one device. This merging eliminates the need for separate external testing equipment, reducing overall system complexity while preserving comprehensive diagnostic capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If external devices perform diagnostics, then error detection can be achieved, but loss of time increases due to setup and operation of multiple tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoiddiagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Diagnostic code is embedded within the customer device during manufacturing, performing preliminary preparation for future diagnostics. This preliminary action ensures that the testing capability is already integrated and ready, eliminating the time required for setting up external devices and enabling immediate error detection whenever needed, thus reducing diagnosis time while maintaining reliable error detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10045234B2Performing an analysis of information to identify a source of an error related to a device
Publication Date: 2018.08.07 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US10045234B2 patent drawing
  • US10045234B2 patent drawing
  • US10045234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tester device may establish a connection to customer devices using protocols, such as a Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) protocol or an Open Mobile Alliance device management (OMA DM) protocol. The tester device may receive information related to wireless communications or operations of the customer devices and the information may be determined by the customer devices. The tester device may perform an analysis of the information. The tester device may provide instructions to the customer devices to cause the customer devices to use a channel to communicate. The tester device may perform a throughput test of the customer devices. The tester device may receive additional information based on performing the throughput test. The tester device may perform a comparison of the information and the additional information. The tester device may provide other instructions to the customer devices to cause the customer devices to use the channel.