Material Testing Machine Chuck Backlash Elimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional material testing machines experience backlashes in the chuck mechanisms, leading to uneven tensile forces applied to test pieces during biaxial tensile tests, resulting in unnatural test behavior and inaccurate evaluation of material properties.

Innovation Solution

A material testing machine design that applies pretensions to the test piece before the actual tensile test, eliminating backlashes by adjusting the positions of the chucks using screws or wedges to ensure equal tensile forces in both orthogonal directions, ensuring proper alignment and force application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If gaps are provided between moving members and shafts for mechanical clearance, then ease of assembly and manufacturing are improved, but backlashes occur in the chucks causing inaccurate force application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidforce application accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pretension to the test piece before the formal tensile test begins. This preliminary action eliminates the backlash caused by gaps between moving members and shafts by pre-compressing the connection points, ensuring that subsequent force measurements are accurate without requiring tighter manufacturing tolerances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a pretension mechanism that applies a preliminary compressive force to counteract the harmful effect of backlash. By applying this anti-action force in advance, the system eliminates the negative impact of mechanical clearance before accurate measurements are required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If backlashes exist in the chuck mechanism, then mechanical tolerance is maintained, but uneven tensile forces are applied to the test piece

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical toleranceVSAvoidforce distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pretension to the test piece in advance, which stabilizes the force distribution by eliminating backlash before the formal test begins. This preliminary stabilization ensures uniform force application throughout the subsequent tensile test

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs load cells to measure the tensile forces applied in each direction and provides feedback control. This feedback mechanism detects force distribution uniformity and adjusts the application of force to maintain stability and eliminate the effects of mechanical backlash

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If different backlash amounts occur in orthogonal directions, then mechanical play is accommodated, but inappropriate tensile forces are applied to the test piece

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical play accommodationVSAvoidtensile force accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses load cells in each orthogonal direction to measure the actual tensile forces being applied. This feedback information is used to detect and correct discrepancies in force application caused by differential backlash, ensuring accurate and appropriate tensile forces are applied in both directions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a dynamic adjustment capability where the force application system can adapt in real-time based on measured backlash conditions. The system dynamically adjusts the force distribution to compensate for different backlash amounts in orthogonal directions, maintaining measurement precision despite mechanical play

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3144661B1Material testing machine
Publication Date: 2021.02.24 SHIMADZU CORP
  • EP3144661B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3144661B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3144661B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Seat members 31 are held in a state of being movable with respect to first slide members 21 or second slide members 22 correspondingly. By rotating screws 39 in directions to increase the distances d between surfaces A of the first slide members 21 or the second slide members 22 and surfaces B of the seat members 31, chucks 25 are moved in directions to increase the distance between the chucks to apply pretension to a test piece correspondingly. When backlash in a force transmission system from a support part to the respective chucks 25 is eliminated, a biaxial tensile test is started.