Materials Testing Machine Automatic Tuning via Specimen Stiffness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Materials testing machines require complex tuning of control parameters for each specimen, necessitating trained personnel and lengthy processes, as the dynamics of the system change with the specimen, and existing autotuning methods lack transparency and require multiple parameters.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates all necessary feedback control gains for position or load control using a single adjustable parameter, specimen stiffness, which can be manually input or calculated from measurable parameters, simplifying the tuning process and providing transparency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple feedback control parameters are tuned manually using empirical guidelines, then control stability and response are improved, but the complexity of the tuning process increases and requires trained personnel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidtuning process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-tuning by automatically calculating all feedback control parameters (Kp, Ki, Kd, Kv) from a single user-provided specimen stiffness value. The microprocessor executes algorithms that compute proportional, integral, derivative, and velocity feedback gains without requiring manual intervention or trained personnel, thereby simplifying the tuning process while maintaining control stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the tuning approach from adjusting multiple complex control parameters manually to inputting a single physical specimen parameter (stiffness). The system then automatically derives all necessary control gains from this single parameter, transforming a complex multi-parameter tuning problem into a simple single-parameter input process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If autotuning algorithms are used to reduce manual tuning, then the tuning time is reduced, but the process becomes a black box with no transparency for the user

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetuning timeVSAvoiduser understanding
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The specimen stiffness value serves as an intermediary that bridges the user's physical understanding of the specimen and the controller's numerical parameters. The user inputs a meaningful physical parameter (stiffness) that they can measure and understand, and the system transparently uses this to calculate all control gains, maintaining user understanding while achieving automated tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If multiple control parameters are stored for reference, then the control settings can be recorded for future use, but the number of parameters that must be known and recorded increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the essential specimen characteristic needed for tuning down to a single parameter - stiffness. By taking out only this critical parameter and deriving all other control parameters from it, the system reduces the number of parameters that need to be stored and managed from multiple control gains to just one specimen property, thereby improving setup efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP2047230B1Automatic tuning of materials testing machine using one specimen parameter
Publication Date: 2015.09.02 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP2047230B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2047230B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

In a method of operating a material testing machine for testing a specimen, the machine has an electrically controllable actuator arranged to apply a force to the specimen. The method includes inputting a single adjustable parameter value, calculating all necessary feedback control gains therefrom, and subsequently conducting a test of the specimen.