Tethered Flying Camera Localization for Stable Aerial Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aerial imaging solutions, both flying and non-flying, face challenges in control complexity, susceptibility to wind, and limited viewpoint accessibility, with existing flying solutions requiring pilot training and being prone to collisions, and non-flying solutions being cumbersome and restrictive.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a volitant body with an actuator, control unit, and mechanical arrangement connected to a reference point via a string assembly, allowing for stabilization, attitude control, and user interaction through mechanical forces, eliminating the need for external infrastructure and enabling intuitive operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If flying solutions are used for aerial imaging, then viewpoint accessibility is improved, but control complexity and susceptibility to wind increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewpoint accessibilityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A string assembly acts as a mechanical intermediary connecting the flying camera to a reference point on the ground. This string provides passive stabilization and localization, eliminating the need for complex active control systems while maintaining viewpoint accessibility. The string serves as both a physical connector and a reference for position estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The flying camera uses its own propulsion system to maintain position relative to the string, rather than relying on external control infrastructure. The evaluation unit on the camera itself processes sensor data to determine position and attitude, enabling autonomous operation without complex external control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If flying solutions are used for aerial imaging, then viewpoint accessibility is improved, but reliability decreases due to collisions and wind susceptibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewpoint accessibilityVSAvoidcollision resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The string assembly serves as a safety intermediary that physically tethers the flying camera to the ground, preventing uncontrolled collisions with obstacles. The string acts as a passive safety mechanism that limits the camera's travel distance and provides mechanical stabilization against wind and turbulence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The string assembly provides beforehand cushioning by being pre-tensioned and ready to absorb forces before collisions occur. The mechanical connection is established in advance to prevent catastrophic failures, and the evaluation unit monitors position to maintain safe distances from obstacles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Ease of operation

If non-flying solutions with extendable poles are used, then control simplicity is improved, but viewpoint accessibility and portability worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidviewpoint accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical extendable pole system with an aerial vehicle that uses its own propulsion and a lightweight string assembly. This substitution eliminates the need for heavy support structures like poles, masts, or base stations, improving portability while maintaining ease of operation through intuitive string-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If mechanical arrangement with string assembly is used, then reliability and ease of operation are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational stabilityVSAvoidmechanical arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex control system from external infrastructure and places it entirely on the flying camera itself. The string assembly is kept deliberately simple as a passive mechanical connector, while the evaluation unit on the camera handles all complex processing of sensor data to determine position, attitude, and user interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The string assembly serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical stabilization, acts as a localization reference, enables user interaction through force sensing, and serves as a safety tether. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems, offsetting the added complexity with consolidated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11042074B2Flying camera with string assembly for localization and interaction
Publication Date: 2021.06.22 PERSPECTIVE ROBOTICS AG
  • US11042074B2 patent drawing
  • US11042074B2 patent drawing
  • US11042074B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided an arrangement comprising, a volitant body comprising at least one actuator; a control unit for controlling said actuator; and a mechanical arrangement for operationally connecting said volitant body to a reference point remote from said volitant body. There is further provided a corresponding method for operating such an arrangement.