Tetradecahedral Toy Block Assembly Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing toy blocks limit creativity and stability in assembled models, leading to frustration and poor intellectual development in children due to restricted shapes and complex assembly processes, with components often failing to snap together effectively.

Innovation Solution

The tetradecahedron toy block features granular unit body components with column heads and slots that allow for simple, stable assembly of various shapes, including asymmetrical and larger upper/lower models, using a locked structure and accessory column heads to enhance connectivity and firmness, while maintaining a low manufacturing cost and easy assembly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If existing unit body components are used to assemble models, then assembly can be performed with simple components, but the models have poor stability and will collapse upon occurrence of small inclination or shaking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of componentsVSAvoidstability of assembled models
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The unit body is divided into multiple surfaces (first surface, second surface, third surface, fourth surface) with different functions. Each surface can connect with adjacent unit bodies in different directions, providing both simplicity and stability through modular segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each unit body is designed as a universal component that can connect with other unit bodies through multiple surfaces in various directions. The same basic unit body shape serves multiple assembly purposes, eliminating the need for specialized components while maintaining stability through proper geometric arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If components with various shapes are used to increase model diversity, then more kinds of models can be assembled, but the processing costs increase and assembly mode becomes complex and trivial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediversity of model shapesVSAvoidcomplexity of assembly mode
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

While the unit body itself is symmetric, the assembly patterns can be asymmetric. The tetradecahedral shape with 14 faces allows for asymmetric arrangements and configurations, enabling diverse model shapes without requiring asymmetric components. Children can create asymmetric structures by arranging identical units in different patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional 3D block assembly to 4D assembly by adding the time dimension of dynamic reconfiguration. Unit bodies can be connected and disconnected, allowing models to evolve and transform over time, increasing versatility without increasing component complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If special splicing modes are provided among different kinds of components, then some components can be connected, but other components cannot effectively spliced and creativity is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity between componentsVSAvoidease of assembly operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

All unit bodies use the same connection interface design with multiple surfaces that can connect to adjacent units. This universal connection method allows any unit body to be spliced with any other unit body in multiple directions, eliminating the need for special splicing modes while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection system is designed to be dynamic rather than static. Unit bodies can be easily connected and disconnected, and the same connection mechanism works for all components regardless of their position or orientation in the assembly, providing flexibility and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of manufacture

If only existing unit body components are used for assembly, then manufacturing cost is low, but the creativity of children is limited and intellectual development is hindered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidcreativity and spatial perception
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tetradecahedral unit body is segmented into 14 faces with different geometric properties (triangular faces, rectangular faces). This segmentation provides multiple connection surfaces that enable diverse spatial arrangements and configurations, stimulating children's creativity and spatial perception while keeping the basic unit shape simple for cost-effective manufacturing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables 4D assembly by allowing dynamic connection and reconfiguration of unit bodies. This adds the dimension of time and transformation, allowing children to create evolving models and explore spatial relationships more deeply, enhancing intellectual development without increasing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3050608B1Tetradecahedral building block
Publication Date: 2019.11.06 ZHANG HENG
  • EP3050608B1 patent drawingFigure 1~9
  • EP3050608B1 patent drawingFigure 10~20
  • EP3050608B1 patent drawingFigure 21~26

AI summary

A device for one or more toy blocks includes a plurality of main unit bodies. The plurality of main unit bodies may have a same structure, shape and volume. Each of the main unit bodies is a tetradecahedron having six square surfaces and eight regular hexagon surfaces. The six square surfaces may be averagely divided into three groups and eight regular hexagon surfaces may be averagely divided into four groups. Two regular hexagon surfaces in a same group are parallel, and more than two main unit bodies are mutually spliced and/or fixedly connected to constitute a group.