Text Buffer Block Scheduling for Variable-Length Replacement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional text replacement operations in business software systems are costly due to the need for shifting and rebuilding characters, requiring additional storage and moving up to 2N bytes, especially for large texts or multiple operations.

Innovation Solution

Divide the text into 'replacement blocks' and 'shift blocks' and determine an optimal schedule for processing each block, ensuring each block is shifted or replaced only once, providing sufficient space for shifting and replacing to minimize character movement and storage needs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional text replacement operation is used, then text can be replaced, but characters must be shifted and rebuilt multiple times requiring additional storage and moving up to 2N bytes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext replacement efficiencyVSAvoidstorage space and data movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The text is divided into replacement blocks (to be replaced) and shift blocks (to be moved). This segmentation allows the algorithm to process each block independently and schedule operations optimally, avoiding redundant shifts and rebuilds that occur in conventional approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithm performs preliminary analysis to determine the final position of each shift block and generates an optimal schedule before executing replacements. This preliminary scheduling ensures that blocks are processed in the correct order, preventing the need for multiple passes and reducing total data movement to at most N bytes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If conventional approach with additional storage is used, then text replacement can be performed, but N bytes of additional storage and up to 2N bytes data movement are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrectness of replacement operationVSAvoidstorage requirements and data movement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm dynamically determines the processing order of blocks based on their final positions and dependencies. By adapting the schedule to the specific text structure and replacement requirements, it achieves correct replacements without requiring additional storage space, processing each character at most once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If each character is processed multiple times during replacement operations, then replacements can be applied, but processing cost increases significantly for large texts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of variable length replacementsVSAvoidprocessing time and computational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The algorithm maintains continuous progress through a single pass by carefully scheduling operations. Once a block is processed, its result is immediately available, and the schedule ensures no character needs to be reprocessed. This continuous action completes all replacements in one efficient pass, reducing processing cost to at most N bytes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS7409637B2Least-effort variable-length text replacement
Publication Date: 2008.08.05 SAP SE
  • US7409637B2 patent drawing
  • US7409637B2 patent drawing
  • US7409637B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of processing text. A method includes providing a unit of text to a text buffer. The unit of text is divided into one or more shift blocks and one or more replacement blocks. Based on a replacement operation of replacing each replacement block with replacement text, a final position of each shift block within the text buffer is determined. A schedule for the replacement operation is then determined based at least in part on the final position of each shift block.