Text Difficulty Assessment via Cohesive Device Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack precision and accuracy in determining the difficulty level of texts, making it challenging for educators to select appropriate reading materials for students based on their reading abilities as per the Common Core State Standards.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that calculates a cohesiveness metric by comparing the number of cohesive devices present in a text to the number expected, using features like sentence length and vocabulary, to assess the difficulty level of a text, facilitating targeted instructional materials.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated text analysis tools are used to determine text difficulty, then productivity in curriculum planning is improved, but measurement precision of text difficulty may be insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurriculum planning efficiencyVSAvoidtext difficulty measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The text analysis system segments the text into multiple linguistic features including sentence length, vocabulary complexity, cohesive devices, and syntactic structures. Each feature is analyzed separately and then integrated to produce an overall difficulty score, allowing for comprehensive yet efficient measurement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters simultaneously to assess text difficulty: it measures sentence length in words, vocabulary frequency using standardized lists, cohesive device density per sentence, and syntactic complexity metrics. By monitoring multiple parameters rather than a single metric, the system achieves both precision and computational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If multiple text features are analyzed to improve measurement precision, then device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext difficulty assessment accuracyVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The analysis system is designed as a multi-functional tool that can assess various text types (narrative, expository, persuasive) across different grade levels using the same core algorithms. It universally applies cohesive device detection, vocabulary analysis, and syntactic parsing across diverse texts, reducing the need for text-specific customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically identifies and categorizes cohesive devices without requiring manual annotation or intervention. It self-calibrates by comparing text features against established linguistic norms and difficulty benchmarks, enabling autonomous operation while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8892421B2Computer-implemented systems and methods for determining a difficulty level of a text
Publication Date: 2014.11.18 EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE
  • US8892421B2 patent drawing
  • US8892421B2 patent drawing
  • US8892421B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for determining a difficulty level of a text. A determination is made as to a number of cohesive devices present in a text. A further determination is made as to a number of cohesive devices expected in the text. A cohesiveness metric is calculated based on the number of cohesive devices present in the text and the number of cohesive devices expected in the text, where the cohesiveness metric is used to identify a difficulty level of the text.