Text Encoder Pruning for Fairer Generative AI Outputs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Generative AI models often exhibit bias in their portrayal of sensitive groups, such as race, gender, and ethnicity, which is difficult to remove entirely from their training datasets.

Innovation Solution

A model pruning approach is employed to generate a debiased model by pruning neuron connections in the text encoder of a generative model associated with specified terms of interest and bias terms, using a binary mask based on a sparsity ratio.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dataset curation is used to remove bias, then fairness is improved, but it is difficult or impossible to remove all bias instances and the process is impractical

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefairnessVSAvoidpracticality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes biased neuron connections from the text encoder by identifying connections associated with bias terms and pruning them using a binary mask. This extraction approach directly removes the source of bias without requiring complete dataset re-curation, making the fairness improvement practical while effectively reducing bias in model outputs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If model pruning is applied to remove bias, then fairness is improved, but model complexity and performance may be affected

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefairnessVSAvoidmodel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively pruning only the neuron connections associated with bias terms in the text encoder, rather than uniformly pruning the entire model. This localized approach targets specific biased connections while preserving the overall model structure and functionality, thereby improving fairness without significantly impacting model complexity or performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If all biased connections are pruned, then fairness is improved, but model performance and functionality may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefairnessVSAvoidmodel performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by pruning only the necessary biased connections identified through the binary mask approach, rather than removing all connections. This selective pruning removes sufficient bias to improve fairness while maintaining the model's overall performance and functionality by preserving non-biased connections that are essential for model operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260065131A1Ensuring fairness in a generative ai model via model pruning
Publication Date: 2026.03.05 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20260065131A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065131A1 patent drawing
  • US20260065131A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In one implementation, a device obtains one or more terms of interest. The device also obtains one or more bias terms. The device selects a generative model configured to generate an output given a textual prompt. The device generates a debiased model by pruning neuron connections in a text encoder of the generative model associated with the one or more terms of interest and the one or more bias terms.