Text Entailment Recognition Group Integration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing text processing methods struggle to accurately classify texts into meaningful groups and identify semantic entailment relations, leading to unclear group overviews and inefficient paraphrasing rule management.

Innovation Solution

A text processing system that performs entailment recognition, generates groups based on semantic relations, and integrates groups with overlapping members, using a computer program to determine group integration based on member overlap and similarity metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the number of paraphrasing rules is increased to improve entailment recognition accuracy, then the accuracy of entailment recognition is improved, but the load on preparation of paraphrasing rules increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of entailment recognitionVSAvoidload on preparation of paraphrasing rules
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the text processing task into two distinct phases: (1) generating multiple candidate paraphrases using a relatively small set of paraphrasing rules, and (2) selecting the best candidate through automated evaluation metrics. This segmentation allows the system to maintain a manageable rule set while achieving high accuracy through systematic candidate evaluation and selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multiple candidate paraphrases by applying paraphrasing rules to generate variations of the original text. Instead of relying on a single complex rule or an exhaustive rule set, the system generates multiple copies/variants of the text and evaluates them to find the best match, thereby reducing the burden on rule preparation while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If texts are clustered based on word similarity, then the grouping process is simplified, but the generated clusters have unclear overviews and cannot be easily interpreted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of text groupingVSAvoidinterpretability of group overview
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple word-similarity-based clustering with an entailment-based grouping mechanism. Instead of relying solely on mechanical word matching, the system uses semantic entailment relationships to determine group membership, thereby maintaining operational simplicity while significantly improving the interpretability and meaningfulness of the generated groups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter for grouping from word similarity to semantic entailment. By shifting the basis of classification from surface-level lexical similarity to deeper semantic relationships, the system maintains the simplicity of automated grouping while producing clusters with clear, interpretable overviews that reflect meaningful semantic connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If entailment recognition is performed using traditional methods, then the processing speed is maintained, but the accuracy of determining semantic relations between texts is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidaccuracy of semantic relation determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary paraphrase generation before the actual entailment evaluation. By pre-generating multiple candidate paraphrases and evaluating them against the hypothesis text, the system prepares multiple potential matches in advance, allowing for more accurate semantic relation determination without significantly impacting the overall processing speed due to the efficiency of the candidate selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9916302B2Text processing using entailment recognition, group generation, and group integration
Publication Date: 2018.03.13 NEC CORP
  • US9916302B2 patent drawing
  • US9916302B2 patent drawing
  • US9916302B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a text processing system capable of classifying a plurality of texts into groups whose overviews are able to be grasped and classifying texts semantically having entailment relation into the same group even if the texts are not determined to have the entailment relation. Entailment recognition means71 performs entailment recognition between texts on given texts. Group generation means 72 selects an individual text and generates a group including texts entailing the selected text as members. Group integration means 73 integrates groups in the case where groups satisfy a predetermined condition based on the degree of overlap of members between groups.