Text Generation Model With Sub-Text Evaluation for Literary Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing deep learning models struggle to generate high-quality literary works such as poems and Ci, couplets, and fictions, as they fail to ensure the semantic and literary features meet preset conditions.

Innovation Solution

A text generation method and apparatus that utilizes a text information generation model, a first evaluation model, and a second evaluation model to determine and splice sub-text information based on semantic and literary features, ensuring the final text meets preset literary and semantic conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a deep learning model is used for text generation, then the generation speed and automation are improved, but the quality and literary features of the generated text deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext generation speedVSAvoidtext quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the text generation process into multiple sequential steps, where each step generates a portion of the text and evaluates it against literary features. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high generation speed while ensuring quality at each stage through targeted evaluation of semantic coherence, rhythmic patterns, and literary characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the deep learning model's generated text is evaluated against preset literary features and semantic requirements. The evaluation results are fed back to guide subsequent generation steps, allowing the system to automatically adjust and improve text quality while maintaining efficient generation throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If the text generation model focuses on literary features, then the text quality is improved, but the generation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext qualityVSAvoidgeneration process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the complex task of generating high-quality literary text into multiple simpler sub-tasks, each focusing on specific literary features such as semantics, rhythm, or rhyme. This segmentation reduces the complexity of each individual generation step while collectively achieving high overall text quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary evaluation and guidance before final text generation by establishing preset literary features and semantic requirements. This preliminary action prepares the generation process in advance, reducing the complexity of real-time decision-making during text generation while ensuring quality outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple evaluation models are used to ensure text quality, then the text reliability is improved, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetext quality assuranceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into multiple specialized evaluation models, each focusing on specific aspects of text quality such as semantic coherence, rhythmic patterns, or literary features. This segmentation allows parallel or sequential evaluation of different aspects without requiring a single comprehensive evaluation, thereby maintaining reliability while managing processing time efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial evaluation at each generation step rather than complete re-evaluation of the entire text. This partial action approach ensures quality reliability by evaluating only the necessary portions of text at each step, reducing the total processing time while maintaining comprehensive quality assurance through cumulative evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250371275A1Text generation method and apparatus, device, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 BEIJING ZITIAO NETWORK TECH CO LTD
  • US20250371275A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371275A1 patent drawing
  • US20250371275A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a text generation method and apparatus, a device, and a storage medium. The text generation method includes: obtaining text information to be processed; and inputting the text information to be processed to a text generation model to obtain target text information corresponding to the text information to be processed, the target text information is determined by splicing the N pieces of sub-text information in a preset order, with a literary feature of the target text information meeting a preset condition; first sub-text information of the target text information is determined by the text generation model according to a semantic feature of the text information to be processed; and i-th sub-text information of the target text information is determined by the text generation model according to literary features of the first sub-text information to (i−1)-th sub-text information.