Automated Text Layout System Glyph Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing automated text layout systems struggle to create visually appealing layouts, particularly in non-traditional text regions, due to issues like excessive hyphenation, irregular line lengths, and the need for manual adjustments, which are time-consuming and labor-intensive for designers.

Innovation Solution

An automated text layout system that selects and applies font features, such as OpenType ligatures, to improve text layout by calculating improvement metrics based on penalty values for line breaks and spacing, allowing for intelligent selection and application of font features to enhance the visual appearance of text without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If automated text layout systems use traditional layout methods, then text can be displayed, but the visual appearance is poor with excessive hyphenation and irregular line lengths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout precisionVSAvoidmanual adjustment effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically evaluates and applies font features without requiring manual designer intervention. The automated text layout system calculates improvement metrics and selects font features independently, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring continuous human operation for each text region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of text display by applying font features that modify glyph selection, spacing, and line breaking parameters. This transforms the text layout from a poor visual appearance state to an improved state by adjusting these critical display parameters automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If designers manually adjust text layout to improve visual appearance, then text layout quality improves, but the process becomes time-consuming and labor-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout qualityVSAvoiddesign efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical manual adjustment process with an automated computational system. Instead of designers physically moving and adjusting each word or character, the system uses algorithms to evaluate layout quality and automatically apply font features, substituting human manual operations with automated mechanical processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The improvement metric calculation serves as an intermediary between the raw text layout and the final improved layout. This intermediary component objectively evaluates the visual appearance and guides the automatic application of font features, mediating the transformation process without requiring direct human judgment for each adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If font features are applied to improve text layout, then visual appearance improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisual appearance qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies font features selectively based on calculated improvement metrics rather than applying all possible features universally. It performs partial action by choosing only those font features that will improve the specific text region's visual appearance, avoiding the complexity of managing all possible font feature combinations across all text.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the text layout improvement process into distinct evaluable components: calculating improvement metrics, evaluating font feature options, and applying selected features. This segmentation allows the complex problem of text layout improvement to be broken into manageable, automated steps that can be processed systematically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11763065B2Font feature selection for text layout
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 ADOBE INC
  • US11763065B2 patent drawing
  • US11763065B2 patent drawing
  • US11763065B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure involves selecting and applying font features to improve the layout of text. For example, a computing system receives initial text. The computing system calculates an improvement metric representing a layout improvement of a font feature applied to the initial text. The font feature includes replacing a first glyph with a second glyph. The font feature, when applied to the initial text, may result in a layout improvement, which can be quantified using the improvement metric. Based on the calculated improvement metric, the computing system applies the font feature to the initial text to generate updated text. The computing system generates, for display on a display device, the updated text.