Fireproofing Textile Chemistry for Washproof Comfort
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing fireproofing treatments for textiles are not fully satisfactory as they lack washproofness, comfort, and aesthetic qualities, often resulting in rigid fabrics that are not suitable for work clothing, and may release toxic formaldehyde.
Innovation Solution
A method involving a two-component bath with a phosphorous compound and urea, pH buffer, and an oxidizing agent, followed by heat-drying and stabilization, which cross-links the polymer on the textile, enhancing washproofness and reducing formaldehyde content, while maintaining comfort and aesthetics.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a substantial impregnation rate is used to achieve sufficient fireproofing resistance, then fireproofing durability is improved, but textile aesthetics and comfort deteriorate due to rigidity
Solution Approach 1:
The patent changes the chemical parameters of the fireproofing composition by using a phosphonate compound with specific molecular structure and introducing a crosslinking agent. This modifies the chemical properties of the treatment to achieve better balance between durability and comfort. The crosslinking agent creates a three-dimensional network that provides durable fireproofing at lower impregnation rates, preventing excessive rigidity while maintaining flame resistance.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent creates a composite chemical structure by combining the phosphonate compound with a crosslinking agent that forms a three-dimensional network. This composite approach allows the fireproofing treatment to achieve both durability and comfort: the crosslinked network provides stable, long-lasting fire resistance while the controlled structure prevents excessive rigidity that would compromise textile comfort and aesthetics.
2Object-affected harmful factors
If conventional fireproofing treatments are applied, then flame resistance is achieved, but toxic formaldehyde is released during treatment and in the finished product
Solution Approach 1:
The patent converts the harmful formaldehyde byproduct into a beneficial outcome by using a phosphonate compound that inherently avoids formaldehyde release. The molecular structure of the phosphonate compound is designed to decompose into non-toxic products when exposed to flame, while the crosslinking agent further stabilizes the structure to prevent any potential harmful emissions. This transforms the chemical pathway from harmful to beneficial, achieving flame resistance without toxic emissions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs a phosphonate compound that decomposes into harmless substances during combustion rather than persisting as toxic formaldehyde. The crosslinked structure ensures complete decomposition into non-toxic products, effectively replacing the harmful formaldehyde with benign decomposition products that pose no threat to human health or the environment.
3Object-affected harmful factors
If existing fireproofing treatments are used, then some flame resistance is achieved, but washproofness is insufficient after multiple washings
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies a crosslinking agent to the phosphonate-treated textile to create a three-dimensional network structure before the textile undergoes multiple washings. This preliminary crosslinking action ensures that the fireproofing treatment is locked into a stable structure that can withstand repeated washing, drying, and mechanical stress without significant loss of fireproofing effectiveness, thereby achieving superior washproofness durability.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The method achieves durable, washproof, and comfortable fireproofed textiles with reduced formaldehyde emission, meeting human-ecological standards like Oeko-Tex 100 Class 1, and extending the useful life of the treated fabrics.
Implementation Method 1
heat-drying of the impregnated textile, during which drying the polymerisation reaction of the urea of component B and the phosphorous compound of component A occurs
Implementation Method 2
stabilisation and neutralisation via an oxidation reaction of the polymer obtained in step c) in a second bath
Implementation Method 3
the second bath includes, in addition to at least one oxidizing compound, a mixture of diacetone acrylamide and of at least one organic acid dihydrazide. This mixture crosslinks the phosphorous compound/urea polymer on the textile
Data Source
AI summary
This invention relates to a method for fireproofing textiles based on a composition having two components comprising:a component A comprising at least one phosphorous compound; anda component B comprising urea and at least one pH buffer, optionally with an oxidizing agent.Said method for fireproofing textiles includes the steps of immersing said textiles in said composition, and of heating, oxidizing and then washing said textiles, which then have excellent human-ecological, comfort, and durable fireproofing properties.