Semi-Automatic Textile Machine Yarn Lot Display

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Semi-automatic open-end rotor spinning machines are inflexible, allowing only one yarn lot to be produced on each side of the machine, limiting their operational efficiency and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of display means at work stations to differentiate yarn lots, allowing for simultaneous production of multiple yarn lots with varying parameters, such as clearing limits, piecing settings, bobbin diameters, and yarn counts, and the use of existing machine components like yarn clearers and signal lamps for displaying yarn lot information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a semi-automatic rotor spinning machine produces only one yarn lot on each side, then the machine structure remains simple and easy to operate, but the machine flexibility and adaptability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyarn lot production flexibilityVSAvoidmachine structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into multiple independent work stations, each capable of producing different yarn lots. This segmentation allows the machine to handle multiple yarn lots simultaneously while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure, as each work station operates independently with its own control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine incorporates dynamic control capabilities that allow work stations to be reassigned to different yarn lots based on production needs. The control system can dynamically adjust which work stations produce which yarn lots, providing flexibility without requiring permanent structural modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If multiple yarn lots are produced simultaneously on different work stations, then production efficiency increases, but the complexity of control and monitoring increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed with universal functionality to manage multiple yarn lots through a unified interface. The same control unit can monitor and control different work stations producing different yarn lots, reducing the need for separate control systems for each yarn lot and thereby limiting the increase in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that automatically monitor the production status of each work station and provide information to the control unit. This automated feedback reduces the manual monitoring burden and allows the control system to manage multiple yarn lots efficiently without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If manual support is required for loading magazines and exchanging bobbins, then the machine structure remains simpler, but the operational efficiency and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The machine incorporates self-service capabilities where the system automatically manages certain operations such as bobbin exchange and magazine loading through integrated control units. This partial automation improves productivity while maintaining a balance with the semi-automatic nature of the machine, avoiding full automation complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances operator support, reduces downtime, and increases efficiency by enabling flexible production of different yarn lots, meeting diverse customer requirements and optimizing routes for processing.

Implementation Method 1

The fiber transport is supported by the negative pressure in the rotor housing, which generates an air flow in the fiber guide channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

generates an air flow in the fiber guide channel, loosens the fibers from the opening assembly and conveys them

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir flow: Convection

Implementation Method 3

The centrifugal acceleration causes the fibers to slip into the collecting groove of the spinning rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal acceleration: Centrifugal Force

Data Source

PatentEP2955143B1Semi-automatic textile machine which produces crosswound bobbins
Publication Date: 2018.02.21 SAURER SPINNING SOLUTIONS GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2955143B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2955143B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2955143B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a semi-automatic textile machine (1) for producing cross-wound bobbins, with workstations (2) each having a winding device (33) for producing a cross-wound bobbin (22) rotatably held in a bobbin frame (21) and a workstation control device (9). According to the invention, the semi-automatic textile machine (1) for producing cross-wound bobbins has display means (44, 45) assigned to the workstations (2) that indicate the yarn batch produced by each workstation (2).