Method and machine for spreading a fabric-type textile sheet

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for spreading and homogenizing the thickness of fibrous sheets result in significant thickness variations, particularly at the edges, leading to unreliable and robust composite parts due to the interlacing of warp and weft yarns, which causes shrinkage and uneven pressure distribution during the weaving process.

Innovation Solution

A method and machine that utilize rotary rollers with adjustable pressure generators, where one roller is flexible and the other is rigid, allowing for axial oscillation and localized pressure adjustments to ensure uniform pressure across the sheet, reducing thickness variability by modulating pressure between the center and edges, and heating the sheet during processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional spreading methods are used on fabrics with significant initial thickness variations, then the fabric can be processed, but the thickness variability remains high and cannot be adequately homogenized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethickness homogeneityVSAvoidadaptability to initial thickness variations
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies localized pressure through independently controllable pressure zones along the roller axis. Each zone can exert different pressure levels tailored to the local thickness characteristics of the fabric, allowing precise correction of thickness variations at different positions without affecting other areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs axially oscillating rollers that dynamically adjust pressure distribution during the spreading process. The oscillation enables the rollers to adapt to varying fabric thickness in real-time, transforming a static pressure application into a dynamic, adaptive process that responds to local thickness conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If high tension is applied to spread the fabric, then spreading effectiveness improves, but roller flexure increases preventing parallelism and homogeneous pressure distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespreading uniformityVSAvoidroller parallelism
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the pressure application into multiple independent localized zones along the roller axis. This segmentation allows each zone to be controlled independently, maintaining pressure homogeneity within each zone while accommodating overall fabric thickness variations, thus preventing roller flexure-induced non-uniformity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes axial oscillation of the rollers to prevent fabric adhesion and maintain consistent pressure distribution. The vibratory motion counteracts the flexure effects by continuously adjusting the contact pressure, ensuring roller parallelism is maintained even under high tension conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

3Shape

If roller diameter is increased to reduce flexure, then roller parallelism improves, but inertia increases significantly requiring more energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller parallelismVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs axial oscillation of the rollers to achieve the benefits of larger diameter rollers (reduced flexure) without actually increasing the roller diameter. The dynamic oscillation compensates for flexure effects, allowing the use of smaller, lighter rollers that consume less energy while maintaining parallelism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the rollers by introducing axial oscillation motion. This parameter change allows the system to achieve improved roller parallelism and pressure distribution without modifying the physical dimensions of the rollers, thereby avoiding the energy penalty associated with larger, more inertial rollers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves fabrics with low thickness variability, enabling the production of composite parts with controlled geometry and improved robustness, maintaining uniform thickness across large widths and reducing thickness standard deviation to less than 90 μm, depending on the basis weight range.

Implementation Method 1

heating the sheet during processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 2

axial oscillation and opposed in phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical vibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS9637850B2Method and machine for spreading a fabric-type textile sheet
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 HEXCEL REINFORCEMENTS SAS
  • US9637850B2 patent drawing
  • US9637850B2 patent drawing
  • US9637850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for spreading a textile sheet where the sheet is caused to run between at least two rotary rollers, the axes of which extend parallel to each other and substantially perpendicular to the running direction of sheet. The sheet under pressure is caused to pass between at least one pressure generator of the rollers driven into axial oscillation and in phase opposition. At least one pressure generator of the rollers has adjustable pressure values along the generator in order to spread the sheet with a low thickness variability.