Textile Machine Suction Device Vacuum Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current suction devices in textile machines face challenges in achieving significant energy savings while optimizing productivity, as they rely on manual or automated filter cleaning methods that do not efficiently adapt to changing vacuum requirements and contamination levels.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for a suction device that calculates the actual and setpoint values of maximum vacuum-requiring operations based on workstation activity, using pressure sensors and a control system to automate filter cleaning and adjust ventilator speed, optimizing energy use and production efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If manual or automated filter cleaning methods are used, then the filter element is cleaned at certain time intervals, but the system does not efficiently adapt to changing vacuum requirements and contamination levels, resulting in suboptimal energy efficiency and productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidadaptation to changing vacuum requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the actual vacuum level and compares it to the target vacuum level, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the ventilator speed and determine when filter cleaning is needed, enabling efficient adaptation to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, time-based filter cleaning schedules to dynamic, condition-based control where ventilator speed and filter cleaning timing are continuously adjusted based on real-time vacuum requirements and contamination levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the ventilator operates at high speed to maintain vacuum during filter contamination, then vacuum requirements are met, but energy consumption increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum requirement fulfillmentVSAvoidventilator energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively determines the optimal filter cleaning time by monitoring vacuum degradation trends before performance critically deteriorates, allowing scheduled cleaning during low-demand periods rather than reacting to vacuum failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the ventilator operating speed parameter based on actual vacuum requirements and filter contamination level, reducing speed when vacuum demand is low and increasing it only when necessary to maintain performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If filter cleaning is performed frequently to maintain optimal performance, then vacuum efficiency is maintained, but production time is lost and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevacuum efficiencyVSAvoidproduction output
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously monitors its own performance, calculates optimal cleaning timing, and schedules filter cleaning operations without external intervention, maximizing productivity by performing maintenance at the most efficient moments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system schedules filter cleaning in advance during periods of low vacuum demand or between production cycles, preventing performance degradation before it occurs rather than reacting to failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If the suction device operates continuously at maximum capacity, then productivity is maximized, but energy consumption and filter contamination accumulate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction outputVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic filter cleaning operations scheduled based on actual usage patterns and contamination accumulation rates, allowing the suction device to operate at high capacity between cleanings while maintaining overall efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables continuous operation within optimal ranges, reduces energy consumption, and ensures timely filter maintenance, thereby enhancing productivity and energy efficiency by automatically adjusting to changing contamination levels and production demands.

Implementation Method 1

with the aid of the suction device, an air flow and a vacuum are generated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum: Vacuum

Implementation Method 2

the air flow is filtered with the aid of a filter element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFiltration: Filter (physical)

Implementation Method 3

A present loss of pressure and/or a volume flow at the filter element are determined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure measurement: Pressure Drop

Data Source

PatentUS11535481B2Method for operating a suction device of a textile machine, and a suction device and a textile machine
Publication Date: 2022.12.27 MASCHINENFABRIK RIETER AG
  • US11535481B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for operating a suction device of a textile machine having a plurality of workstations wherein an air flow and a vacuum are produced with aid of the suction device. The method includes filtering the air flow with a filter element, and determining a loss of pressure or volume flow at the filter element. Based on the loss of pressure or the volume flow, an actual value is calculated for present maximum vacuum-requiring operations of the workstations that can be simultaneously executed. Based on the number of operating workstations, a setpoint value is determined for the maximum vacuum-requiring operations of the workstations that can be simultaneously executed. The setpoint value is compared to the actual value for control of the suction device.