Textile Underlayment Perforation for Tool-Free Custom Sizing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current methods for customizing carpet and rug underlayment sizing are inefficient and costly, with manufacturers facing challenges in economies of scale and consumers incurring additional installation costs due to the need for on-site trimming.

Innovation Solution

A perforating device with a blade assembly and cylindrical anvil, driven by a motor, that makes parallel perforating cuts in textile materials, allowing for customizable sizing without specialized tools.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If underlayment is manufactured in standard sizes, then economies of scale are achieved and manufacturing costs are reduced, but consumers incur additional installation costs and time for on-site trimming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidinstallation convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-perforating the underlayment material during manufacturing in standard sizes. These perforations are placed at predetermined intervals and positions, enabling consumers to easily tear the material to custom sizes during installation without requiring specialized cutting tools. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining manufacturing efficiency while dramatically improving installation convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If underlayment is custom-sized for each project, then installation convenience and precision are improved, but manufacturing costs and complexity increase due to loss of economies of scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-perforating the underlayment material during manufacturing in standard sizes. These perforations are placed at predetermined intervals and positions, enabling consumers to easily tear the material to custom sizes during installation without requiring specialized cutting tools. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining manufacturing efficiency while dramatically improving installation convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If underlayment is trimmed on-site using free-hand tools, then customization is achieved, but installation time increases and straight lines are difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesizing flexibilityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-perforating the underlayment material during manufacturing in standard sizes. These perforations are placed at predetermined intervals and positions, enabling consumers to easily tear the material to custom sizes during installation without requiring specialized cutting tools. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining manufacturing efficiency while dramatically improving installation convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Quantity of substance

If standard-sized underlayment is ordered in bulk, then material cost per area is reduced, but hidden costs arise from trimming requirements and potential material waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial cost efficiencyVSAvoidmaterial waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-perforating the underlayment material during manufacturing in standard sizes. These perforations are placed at predetermined intervals and positions, enabling consumers to easily tear the material to custom sizes during installation without requiring specialized cutting tools. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining manufacturing efficiency while dramatically improving installation convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables on-site customization of underlayment sizing efficiently, reducing material and installation costs while maintaining precision and ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

a shaft that can be coupled to a motor that drives rotation of the shaft and the annular blades

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the outer edge of the teeth of the blades in the blade assembly contact the outer surface of the cylindrical anvil when rotating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

the blades include alternating teeth and gaps so that, when rotated, the spaced annular blades can make a plurality of parallel perforating cuts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250249619A1Systems and methods for perforating textiles, including carpet and rug underlayment
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 THOMPSON JOHN
  • US20250249619A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249619A1 patent drawing
  • US20250249619A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are examples of a perforating device for perforating a textile material, such as carpet or textile underlayment. In an example, the perforating device includes a multi-blade assembly rotationally driven by a motor. The blade assembly can be coupled to a rotary shaft such that the blades rotate with the shaft. The blades can include alternating teeth and gaps on their outer edges to create a plurality of parallel perforated cuts. Spacers can be positioned between the blades to separate them a predetermined distance. An anvil can be positioned below and adjacent the blade edges such that the teeth of the blades touch or nearly touch the anvil surface. The perforating cuts produce a textile that can be customized in terms of its size and shape at an installation site by hand, and without the need for any specialized tools or equipment.