Textured Garment Drag Reduction via Segmented Surface Protrusions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sports garments fail to effectively reduce aerodynamic drag across a wide speed range of 5-20 m/s due to sensitivity to position, limited texture types, and increased surface drag from trip edges and textured surfaces, which are not optimized for specific sports or events.

Innovation Solution

A garment with a textured fabric featuring a substantially uniform texture height of 0.2-0.8mm, comprising isolated texture formations in rows transverse to airflow, which minimizes pressure drag without significantly increasing surface drag, allowing for improved aerodynamic performance across the 5-20 m/s speed range.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If trip edges are used to reduce pressure drag, then pressure drag is reduced, but surface drag increases and position sensitivity becomes extreme

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dragVSAvoidposition sensitivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The trip edge is segmented into multiple discrete texture formations (protrusions, ridges, or patterned elements) distributed across the garment surface rather than using a single continuous trip edge. This segmentation reduces sensitivity to exact positioning while maintaining the flow transition effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the garment have different texture characteristics - the front and sides have specific texture heights and patterns optimized for their local flow conditions, while the rear has different characteristics. This local optimization reduces overall position sensitivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Force

If textured surfaces are applied to reduce pressure drag, then pressure drag is reduced, but surface drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure dragVSAvoidsurface drag
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The texture height is precisely controlled within specific ranges (0.3-1.5mm on front and sides, 1.5-3.0mm on rear) to optimize the balance between pressure drag reduction and surface drag minimization. This parameter optimization ensures the textured surface transitions flow effectively without creating excessive friction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The textured surface is applied selectively to specific garment regions (front, sides, and rear with different texture heights) rather than uniformly across the entire garment. This partial application reduces overall surface drag while maintaining pressure drag reduction benefits in critical areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform repeating texture patterns are used, then manufacturing is simplified, but aerodynamic performance is not optimized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric productionVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The garment features different texture patterns and heights in different regions - the front and sides have one texture configuration while the rear has a different texture height and pattern. This local differentiation optimizes aerodynamic performance for each region's specific flow conditions while remaining manufacturable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If seams are added to accommodate fabric texture changes, then different fabric textures can be used, but overall drag increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric texture variationVSAvoidaerodynamic drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple fabric panels with different textures are joined through seamless knitting or bonding techniques that eliminate traditional seams. This merging approach allows different fabric textures to be combined without the drag-increasing effect of seam lines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The garment achieves reduced aerodynamic drag across the 5-20 m/s speed range, enhancing athletic performance by delaying flow separation and minimizing surface friction, while being less sensitive to fit and environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

pressure drag caused primarily by the separation of vortices from the boundary layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 2

the separation of vortices from the boundary layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoundary layer: Boundary Layer

Implementation Method 3

surface drag, caused by friction as the air passes over the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3311686B1Low drag garment
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 ENDURA SPA
  • EP3311686B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3311686B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP3311686B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

A low drag garment comprises a textured fabric in at least one side region of the garment, wherein the textured fabric has a substantially uniform texture height in the range 0.2-0.8mm.