Texturing Machine Vertical Layout for Operational Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing texturing machines require significant operational effort and space due to the distribution of processing units across multiple levels, making it difficult to efficiently operate processing points and transport bobbins, especially when starting a process or dealing with thread breaks.

Innovation Solution

The texturing machine design arranges the process frame with processing units on an upper service floor and the winding frame with winding units on a lower service floor, allowing all essential process units to be operated from a single aisle, with bobbin transport occurring on the lower level, minimizing space usage and enabling efficient operation and compact arrangement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If processing units are distributed across multiple levels, then machine functionality is achieved, but operational complexity and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidmachine structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a horizontal distribution of processing units across multiple levels to a vertical stacking arrangement. The process frame is positioned on an upper service floor while the winding frame is on a lower service floor, utilizing the vertical dimension to consolidate operations. This dimensional change allows all processing points to be operated from a single upper aisle, reducing operational complexity while maintaining full machine functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the operational functions of multiple levels into a single operational plane. By positioning the process frame above the winding frame, both processing and winding operations can be accessed from the same upper service aisle, consolidating what were previously separate operational zones into one unified access point, thereby improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Area of stationary object

If machine frame parts are arranged in one plane, then space efficiency improves, but operational accessibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloor space requirementVSAvoidprocessing point accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves the conflict between space efficiency and operational accessibility by moving from a two-dimensional planar arrangement to a three-dimensional vertical arrangement. The process frame is elevated to the upper service floor while the winding frame remains on the lower service floor. This vertical separation allows the machine to maintain a compact footprint on the floor while providing excellent accessibility to all processing points from the upper service aisle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If doffing gear is integrated between winding frames, then space is saved, but operational interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine footprintVSAvoidbobbin transport efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the doffing operations from the integrated space between winding frames and relocates them to the lower service floor. The doffing gear is positioned to serve the winding units on the lower level, separating bobbin removal operations from the upper-level processing activities. This extraction eliminates operational interference while maintaining space efficiency through vertical arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If processing units are on upper level and winding units on lower level, then operational efficiency improves, but bobbin transport complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing operation efficiencyVSAvoidbobbin transport system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces the lower service floor as an intermediary level for bobbin transport operations. Full bobbins are removed from winding units on the lower service floor through the doffing gear, while half-full bobbins are delivered to the upper service floor through a separate delivery system. This intermediary arrangement facilitates efficient vertical bobbin transfer while keeping processing and winding operations on different levels for optimal productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3047058B1Texturing machine
Publication Date: 2017.06.21 OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3047058B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3047058B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3047058B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a texturing machine having a plurality of processing points. The texturing machine comprises a multi-part machine frame for accommodating the processing points. The machine frame is composed of a process frame for accommodating a plurality of process units, a winding frame for accommodating a plurality of winding units, and a creel frame for accommodating a plurality of supply spools. The process frame, the winding frame, and the creel frame are distributed among a plurality of operating levels. According to the invention, in order to achieve a compact and operation-friendly arrangement, the process frame having the process units is arranged on an upper operating level along an operating passage and the winding frame having the winding units is arranged on the lower operating level along a doffing passage.