TF-CSMA/CA Wireless Scheduling via Dynamic Frequency and Bandwidth Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in resource utilization due to time-domain overheads and interference, particularly in high-speed transmission rates, where existing methods require explicit signaling and synchronization for scheduling in time and frequency domains.

Innovation Solution

The TF-CSMA/CA method allows for decentralized scheduling in both time and frequency domains using only collisions, successes, and carrier sensing as implicit signals, dynamically adjusting channel bandwidth and center frequency without synchronization or explicit signaling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If explicit signaling and synchronization are used for scheduling in time and frequency domains, then coordination between stations is improved, but overhead and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordination between stationsVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables stations to autonomously select non-overlapping time-spectrum blocks through distributed decision-making based on local observations of collisions and carrier sensing, eliminating the need for central coordination or explicit signaling mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses collision outcomes and carrier sensing results as feedback signals to guide stations' frequency selection and backoff decisions, allowing dynamic adaptation without additional overhead signaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If spectrum scanning or central control is employed to coordinate transmissions, then interference avoidance is improved, but system complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference avoidanceVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Stations independently determine their transmission parameters by observing collision patterns and carrier sensing outcomes, self-organizing into non-overlapping frequency allocations without central control or spectrum scanning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts collision information, which is traditionally a harmful event, into useful feedback that guides stations' frequency selection and backoff decisions, enabling interference avoidance without additional signaling overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Device complexity

If static channel assignment is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to variable traffic loads deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidspectrum allocation adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic spectrum allocation where stations adapt their frequency choices and transmission timing based on real-time observations of collisions and carrier sensing, allowing the system to respond to variable traffic loads without complex centralized control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10321488B2CSMA/CA in time and frequency domains
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 INTEL CORP
  • US10321488B2 patent drawing
  • US10321488B2 patent drawing
  • US10321488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention concerns a method for a communication device to transmit a data packet in a wireless communication system. The method comprises: determining a first set of transmission parameters comprising a first central transmission frequency and a first spectral bandwidth; transmitting a first data packet by applying the first set of transmission parameters; determining whether or not the first data packet collided with a second data packet from a second communication device; determining a second set of transmission parameters, which in case of collision comprises a second central transmission frequency, different from the first central transmission frequency, and a second spectral bandwidth, which is different from the first spectral bandwidth with a first, non-zero probability and the same as the first spectral bandwidth with a second probability; and transmitting a second data packet by applying the second set of transmission parameters.