Thematic Map Preparation Using Style Master Metadata

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current thematic map preparation methods are labor-intensive, subjective, and lack automation, making it difficult to efficiently manage and compare multi-source heterogeneous data, leading to inconsistencies and security risks in data representation and update.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for preparing thematic maps by generating a map style master with metadata, processing original input data to acquire attribute color identifications, and updating the map style master to create a thematic map, enabling the fusion of multi-source heterogeneous data for automated and standardized mapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual methods are used to prepare thematic maps, then flexibility and customization are improved, but labor intensity increases and automation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidautomation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The thematic map preparation process is segmented into distinct modules: data acquisition module, data processing module, map style master generation module, and map rendering module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, enabling automated processing while maintaining flexibility through modular configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating map style masters with standardized templates, color schemes, and layout configurations before actual map production. This preparation work is done once and reused across multiple mapping tasks, reducing repetitive manual labor while maintaining consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual methods are used to prepare thematic maps, then customization capability is improved, but consistency and standardization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizationVSAvoidconsistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses parameter-based control where map style masters define standardized parameters for colors, labels, symbols, and layouts. Users can customize maps by modifying parameters within predefined ranges and options, ensuring consistency is maintained through parameter constraints while allowing necessary customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The map style master serves multiple functions: it standardizes map production, enables batch processing, maintains consistency across different maps, and allows customization through configurable parameters. This universal template approach resolves the contradiction between standardization and customization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Quantity of substance

If data from multiple sources are integrated manually, then data comprehensiveness is improved, but time consumption and labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata comprehensivenessVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple data sources by integrating various data formats and structures into a unified processing framework. The data processing module automatically combines geographical data, attribute data, and spatial information from multiple sources, achieving comprehensive data integration through automated merging operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying mechanisms to replicate standardized processing procedures across different data sources. Once a data processing workflow is established, it can be copied and applied to multiple datasets automatically, reducing time consumption while maintaining comprehensive data integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Productivity

If automated data processing is implemented, then productivity is improved, but data security risks may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoiddata security
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between automated processing and raw data. The map style master acts as a mediator that controls and regulates data processing operations, ensuring that automated processes follow predefined security protocols and access controls while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12182907B1Thematic map preparation method and apparatus, storage medium and electronic device
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 COLD & ARID REGIONS ENVIRONMENTAL & ENG RES INST CHINESE
  • US12182907B1 patent drawing
  • US12182907B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Thematic map preparation method and apparatus, a storage medium and an electronic device are provided. The method includes: preparing a map style master based on an aimed application field; generating metadata information corresponding to the map style master, wherein the metadata information includes a mapping relationship between each of the geographical units in the map style master and the initial color identification corresponding thereto, and the metadata information further includes location information about the legend in the map style master; processing original input data, and acquiring an attribute color identification of each geographical unit in the original input data; and replacing the initial color identification corresponding to each of the geographical units in the map style master with the attribute color identification, and updating the legend, so as to obtain a thematic map of the original input data when aimed at the application field.