Thermal Bend Actuator for Inkjet Nozzles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thermal bend actuated inkjet nozzles face inefficiencies in bend actuation and drop ejection characteristics, particularly in achieving high packing density and optimal droplet ejection with minimal energy input.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a thermal bend actuator with a reduced working face area, optimized for peak actuator velocity, and a hydrophobic layer to control ink pressure, allowing for efficient ink ejection and varying droplet volumes by adjusting hydrostatic pressure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the working face area of the thermal bend actuator is reduced, then drop ejection efficiency is improved and satellite droplets are reduced, but the actuator generates less positive pressure pulse in the ink

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop ejection efficiencyVSAvoidpositive pressure pulse in ink
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the working face area to a specific range (less than 800 square microns, preferably 200-600 square microns) to achieve peak actuator velocity. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by finding the sweet spot where the actuator generates sufficient pressure pulse while maintaining high ejection efficiency and minimizing satellite droplets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent focuses on achieving peak actuator velocity through optimized working face area, emphasizing the dynamic aspect of the actuation process. The velocity-optimized design ensures that the actuator moves rapidly enough to eject droplets efficiently while generating adequate pressure pulse during the brief actuation window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If the working face area is optimized for peak velocity, then ejection efficiency improves, but the area is constrained to less than 800 square microns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak actuator velocityVSAvoidworking face area
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a specific parameter range for the working face area (less than 800 square microns, preferably 200-600 square microns) that optimizes peak actuator velocity. This parameter constraint resolves the contradiction by defining the optimal size range that achieves both high velocity and efficient ejection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If hydrostatic pressure is increased to increase droplet volume, then droplet volume increases, but energy input requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet volumeVSAvoidenergy input
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes hydrostatic pressure (a hydraulic principle) to control droplet volume. By adjusting the hydrostatic pressure in the ink supply system, the patent enables variable droplet volumes without requiring additional energy input for each droplet, as the pressure provides the driving force passively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances drop ejection efficiency, reduces satellite droplets, and enables denser nozzle packing while achieving consistent and adjustable droplet volumes, improving overall print quality and versatility in inkjet printing applications.

Implementation Method 1

when a current is passed through the active beam, the active beam heats and expands relative to the passive beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

the active beam heats and expands relative to the passive beam resulting in bending of the actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

a hydrophobic layer to control ink pressure, allowing for efficient ink ejection and varying droplet volumes by adjusting hydrostatic pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrophobic effect: Hydrophobe

Data Source

PatentUS7997690B2Inkjet printer
Publication Date: 2011.08.16 MEMJET TECH LTD
  • US7997690B2 patent drawing
  • US7997690B2 patent drawing
  • US7997690B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An inkjet printer including: a printhead having a plurality of nozzles assemblies, each nozzle assembly having: a nozzle chamber for containing ink, the chamber having a nozzle opening and an ink inlet; and a bend actuator for ejecting ink droplets from the nozzle opening by generating a positive pressure pulse in the ink during bending of the actuator. An ink supply system supplies ink to the printhead so that a hydrostatic pressure of ink can be varied. Increasing the hydrostatic ink pressure increases a volume of the ejected ink droplets, and decreasing the hydrostatic ink pressure decreases a volume of the ejected ink droplets.