Thermal Break Wood Stud with Rigid Insulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Standard wood framing systems suffer from thermal bridging, which reduces thermal efficiency and increases material and labor costs, as they rely on solid lumber that conducts heat and cold, limiting insulation space and effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a thermal break wood and rigid insulation stud system using non-dimensional lumber sections with a thermal break section of rigid foam insulation in between, secured by a non-metallic truss arrangement of mechanical fasteners, allowing for improved strength and increased insulation space, and reducing the number of studs needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If solid lumber is used for wall framing, then structural strength is provided, but thermal bridging occurs that reduces thermal efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidthermal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The wall assembly is segmented into distinct thermal zones by introducing rigid insulation boards between structural components. The insulation segments break the continuous thermal path through solid lumber, creating thermal breaks that reduce heat transfer while maintaining structural integrity through strategic placement of insulating segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wall system uses composite construction combining rigid insulation materials with wood framing members. The composite assembly integrates insulating boards with structural lumber to create a hybrid system that simultaneously provides both thermal resistance and structural strength, eliminating the need for solid lumber continuous paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Loss of energy

If rigid insulation is wrapped around the entire exterior, then thermal loss is minimized, but material costs, carbon footprint, and labor costs significantly increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal lossVSAvoidmaterial and labor costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The insulation is extracted from being a continuous exterior wrap and is instead strategically placed only at critical thermal bridge locations such as between studs, at corners, and around openings. This selective placement eliminates the need for complete exterior wrapping while still capturing the majority of thermal losses at the most problematic areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Insulation is applied with local quality by concentrating rigid insulation boards specifically at thermal bridge locations rather than uniformly across the entire wall surface. This localized approach places insulation where it is most needed to interrupt heat flow paths, reducing overall material usage while maintaining effective thermal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If more solid wood volume is used in walls, then structural integrity is improved, but available insulation space is reduced and thermal efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidinsulation space
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The insulation is placed in the dimensional space between structural components rather than requiring increased wall thickness. By utilizing the gap dimension created by spaced framing members and inserting rigid insulation boards in this interstitial space, the system maintains structural integrity with standard lumber spacing while maximizing insulation volume without increasing overall wall footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances energy efficiency by 18-39%, reduces material usage and labor costs, conserves trees, improves sound transmission loss, and achieves better insulation qualities at a lower cost, while maintaining structural integrity and reducing the need for additional insulation and carpentry time.

Implementation Method 1

a thermal break section of rigid foam insulation therebetween

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentUS9783985B2Thermal break wood stud with rigid insulation with non-metal fasteners and wall framing system
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 ENVIROBON INC
  • US9783985B2 patent drawing
  • US9783985B2 patent drawing
  • US9783985B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A thermal break wood and rigid insulation stud is comprised of two non-dimensional lumber sections with a thermal break section of rigid foam insulation therebetween. A non-metallic truss arrangement of mechanical fasteners holds the lumber and insulation sections secured together greatly improving the strength of the thermal break wood and rigid insulation stud. The studs in a wall are 24″ on center. The studs are used for headers and sills and also may be used for top and bottom plates. The corners have an exterior all wood stud, an interior all wood stud and an interior all wood stud adjacent to the interior wood stud completing the interior corner for nailing gypsum board thereto. This corner has a thermal break space between the exterior and interior wood studs for insulation placement. The corners may also have two 3×6 thermal studs oriented 90 degrees from each other and an interior all wood stud for completing the interior corner for nailing gypsum board thereto. This corner arrangement also has a thermal break through its construction.