Thermal Compensation Model Adjustment for Machine Tool Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine tools face challenges in maintaining accuracy due to thermal deformation, requiring complex and time-consuming thermal compensation models that are difficult to modify, leading to processing errors and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A thermal compensation control system for machine tools that includes a cutter, driver, tool setting probe, temperature sensor, workpiece touch probe, and controller, which detects temperature and processing errors to dynamically adjust the temperature compensation model in real-time, allowing for immediate modifications to ensure accurate processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a thermal compensation system is established to suppress thermal deformation, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional control cards, input/output cards, memory, and interface modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal deformation suppressionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the workpiece touch probe measures processing errors in real-time, and this measurement information is fed back to the controller to dynamically adjust the thermal compensation model. This closed-loop feedback system allows the compensation parameters to be automatically updated based on actual processing results, improving manufacturing precision without requiring complex manual recalibration procedures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automatic model updating. The controller automatically modifies the thermal compensation model based on measurements from the workpiece touch probe, eliminating the need for manual intervention by operators. The system serves itself by automatically detecting processing errors and adjusting compensation parameters, thereby reducing operational complexity while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If modeling technologies are implemented to obtain thermal compensation equations, then manufacturing precision is improved, but loss of time increases as the modeling process takes more than one week

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal compensation accuracyVSAvoidmodeling time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-establishing a thermal compensation model structure before actual processing begins. The initial model is created using standard modeling techniques, and then the system automatically refines it during operation through feedback from the workpiece touch probe. This approach eliminates the need for time-consuming one-week modeling processes for each new application, as the basic model framework is already in place and only requires incremental adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a static thermal compensation model to a dynamic one that automatically adapts during operation. The controller continuously updates compensation parameters based on real-time measurements from the workpiece touch probe, allowing the model to evolve and improve accuracy without requiring lengthy remodeling processes. This dynamic adjustment capability reduces modeling time from weeks to minutes or seconds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If the thermal compensation model is modified after essential elements are replaced, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but loss of time increases due to potential model reconstruction requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompensation accuracy maintenanceVSAvoidmodel modification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback mechanism automatically detects when processing errors exceed acceptable thresholds after essential elements are replaced. The workpiece touch probe measures actual processing results, and this information is fed back to the controller, which then automatically adjusts the thermal compensation model parameters to adapt to the new components, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual model reconstruction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting component replacements through increased processing errors and autonomously updating the thermal compensation model. The controller monitors processing quality continuously and triggers automatic model adjustments when necessary, reducing the time and expertise required for manual model modification after component replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If an open-loop control system is used for thermal compensation, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to inaccuracy from worn-out machine tools and lost accuracy of parts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidcompensation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the open-loop control system into a closed-loop system by introducing the workpiece touch probe that measures actual processing errors and feeds this information back to the controller. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically compensate for accuracy losses due to worn-out components and part degradation, maintaining high manufacturing precision without significantly increasing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual inspection and adjustment mechanisms with an automated measurement and control system. The workpiece touch probe provides automatic measurement of processing errors, substituting for manual measurement methods, and the controller automatically adjusts compensation parameters, replacing manual calibration processes. This substitution maintains simplicity while dramatically improving and maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This system significantly reduces processing errors and improves efficiency by continuously monitoring and adjusting the temperature compensation model, minimizing inaccuracies and maintaining high precision over time.

Implementation Method 1

a temperature sensor configured to detect a measured temperature of the cutter or the driver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS10481575B2Thermal compensation method and thermal compensation control system for machine tools
Publication Date: 2019.11.19 IND TECH RES INST
  • US10481575B2 patent drawing
  • US10481575B2 patent drawing
  • US10481575B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A thermal compensation control system for a machine tool having a milling cutter and a cutter driver includes a tool setting probe, a temperature sensor, a workpiece touch probe, and a controller. The cutter driver is connected to the milling cutter to drive the milling cutter to process the work piece based on a control signal. The tool setting probe is configured to detect a cutter length of the milling cutter. The temperature sensor is configured to sense a measured temperature of the cutter driver or the milling cutter. The workpiece touch probe is configured to measure processing errors of the processed work piece. The controller is configured to generate the control signal based on a processing instruction, a temperature compensation model, the cutter length, and the measured temperature. The controller is further configured to determine whether to modify the temperature compensation model based on the processing errors.