Thermal Gradient Pyrolysis for Silicon Anode Adhesion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional battery electrodes are costly, cumbersome, and inefficient, limiting battery lifetime due to complex and time-consuming implementation processes, and issues such as silicon anode volume changes causing electrical isolation and capacity loss during lithiation and delithiation.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for thermal gradient pyrolysis of electrodes, using a thermal control apparatus with cooling channels near the current collector to maintain a temperature gradient during pyrolysis, allowing higher pyrolysis temperatures without adverse reactions and improving adhesion and flexibility of the active material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional pyrolysis methods are used for battery electrodes, then the process is simple, but the battery lifetime is limited due to complex implementation and silicon anode volume changes causing electrical isolation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery lifetimeVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the pyrolysis process into distinct temperature zones (first temperature zone for binder pyrolysis, second temperature zone for carbonization) with intermediate cooling sections. This segmented approach allows controlled thermal processing that prevents adverse reactions while achieving complete pyrolysis, thereby improving battery lifetime without excessive process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by creating different thermal environments at different locations within the pyrolysis system. The first heating section operates at a first temperature for binder pyrolysis, while the second heating section operates at a second temperature for carbonization. This localized thermal control ensures optimal conditions at each stage, resolving the contradiction between reliability and process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If higher pyrolysis temperatures are used, then adhesion and flexibility of active material are improved, but adverse reactions occur between active material and current collector

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesion and flexibilityVSAvoidadverse reactions
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by first pyrolyzing the binder material at a lower first temperature in the first heating section before exposing the active material to higher temperatures. This preliminary thermal treatment removes volatile components and stabilizes the structure, allowing subsequent high-temperature carbonization to improve adhesion and flexibility without causing adverse reactions between the active material and current collector

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by varying the temperature profile through different heating sections and cooling zones. The temperature is gradually increased from the first temperature (for binder pyrolysis) to the second temperature (for carbonization), with intermediate cooling sections preventing thermal runaway. This controlled parameter change enables achieving improved adhesion and flexibility while avoiding adverse reactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If conventional electrode fabrication is used, then the process is straightforward, but production efficiency is low and manufacturing is costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuity of useful action through a continuous pyrolysis process where the electrode moves through sequential heating sections and cooling zones without interruption. The first heating section performs binder pyrolysis, followed by the second heating section for carbonization, with intermediate cooling sections maintaining process continuity. This continuous operation significantly improves production efficiency while the standardized multi-zone design keeps manufacturing straightforward

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Reliability

If uniform heating is applied during pyrolysis, then the process is simple to control, but structural integrity and electrical conductivity are compromised due to thermal gradients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrity and electrical conductivityVSAvoidthermal control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the thermal control system into multiple heating sections and cooling zones. The first heating section provides controlled heating for binder pyrolysis, the first cooling section manages thermal transitions, the second heating section provides high-temperature carbonization, and the second cooling section completes the thermal cycle. This segmented thermal control maintains structural integrity and electrical conductivity by preventing thermal shock, while the modular design keeps control complexity manageable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances battery cycle life and production efficiency by maintaining the structural integrity and electrical conductivity of silicon-based anodes, reducing solid electrolyte interphase formation and impedance, and enabling higher energy density.

Implementation Method 1

A method and system for thermal gradient pyrolysis of electrodes, using a thermal control apparatus with cooling channels near the current collector to maintain a temperature gradient during pyrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal gradient: Temperature Gradient

Implementation Method 2

using a thermal control apparatus with cooling channels near the current collector to maintain a temperature gradient during pyrolysis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat removal: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

A method and system for thermal gradient pyrolysis of electrodes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPyrolysis: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11600809B2Method and system for thermal gradient during electrode pyrolysis
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 ENEVATE CORP
  • US11600809B2 patent drawing
  • US11600809B2 patent drawing
  • US11600809B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for thermal gradient during electrode pyrolysis may include fabricating the battery electrode by pyrolyzing an active material on a metal current collector, wherein the active material comprises silicon particles in a binder material, the binder material being pyrolyzed such that a resistance at an inner surface of the active material in contact with the current collector is at least 50% higher than a resistance at an outer surface of the active material. The active material may be pyrolyzed by electromagnetic radiation, which may be provided by one or more lasers, which may include one or more CO2 lasers. The electromagnetic radiation may be provided by one or more infrared lamps. An outer edge of the current collector may be gripped using a thermal transfer block that removes heat from the current collector during pyrolysis of the active material and subsequent cool down.