Thermal Hydroprocessing Crude Oil to Olefins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current hydrocracking, fluid catalytic cracking, and steam cracking processes for converting crude oil to chemicals are inefficient, requiring multiple steps, high investment costs, and significant fuel consumption, with suboptimal production of high-value chemicals like ethylene and propylene.

Innovation Solution

A thermal hydro-processing method using hydrogen and water/steam to upgrade crude oils and residues, with a solvent to keep asphaltenes in solution, converting hydrocarbons to lighter molecules, and further processing these upgraded products to produce ethylene, propylene, and benzene in a streamlined process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple feed preparation units (hydrocrackers, cokers, hydrotreaters) are used for upgrading heavy ends, then the conversion of crude oil to chemicals is achieved, but the process complexity and investment costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidnumber of processing units
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple feed preparation units (hydrocracker, coker, hydrotreater) into a single integrated processing unit that performs upgrading, hydrocracking, and hydrodesulfurization simultaneously. This merger reduces the number of separate units required while maintaining conversion efficiency, directly addressing the contradiction between productivity and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing unit is designed to perform multiple functions within a single reactor system: upgrading heavy ends, cracking hydrocarbons, removing sulfur, and producing chemical feeds. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for sequential specialized units, reducing overall process complexity while maintaining high conversion rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If high pressure conditions (up to 200 barg) are employed in hydrocracking, then the conversion of heavy hydrocarbons is enhanced, but the equipment investment costs and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydrocracking conversion rateVSAvoidequipment investment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes pressure parameters by operating at reduced pressures (1-10 barg) compared to conventional high-pressure hydrocracking (200 barg). This parameter change achieves acceptable conversion rates without requiring expensive high-pressure equipment, directly addressing the contradiction between productivity and ease of manufacture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces localized catalyst beds with specific properties (bifunctional catalysts containing metal particles on acidic supports) at critical locations within the reactor to enhance conversion efficiency at lower pressures. This localized quality enhancement allows reduced pressure operation while maintaining conversion rates, resolving the contradiction between productivity and equipment cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If conventional multi-step upgrading processes are used, then heavy ends are converted to chemical feeds, but large amounts of fuel are consumed for preheating at each stage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechemical feed productionVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple preheating stages into a single preheating step before the integrated processing unit. By eliminating intermediate preheating steps required by sequential units, the total fuel consumption for heating is significantly reduced while still achieving the necessary temperature for conversion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The continuous flow through the integrated unit allows heat to be retained and utilized more efficiently throughout the process, reducing the need for repeated heating cycles. The continuous operation maintains thermal energy within the system, minimizing fuel consumption while sustaining high conversion rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If cracking processes are used to produce olefins and aromatics, then high value chemicals are obtained, but coke formation increases requiring additional handling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveolefin and aromatic productionVSAvoidcoke formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses catalysts as intermediaries that facilitate the cracking reaction while suppressing coke formation. The bifunctional catalysts (metal particles on acidic supports) mediate the conversion process to produce olefins and aromatics with minimal coking, directly addressing the contradiction between productivity and harmful factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the potential harm of coke formation into a benefit by using controlled catalytic cracking that produces desirable aromatic chemicals while minimizing unwanted coke. The process transforms what would be a waste product (coke) into valuable aromatic compounds, resolving the contradiction between productivity and harmful factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method reduces the number of processing units, minimizes fuel consumption, and maximizes the production of high-value chemicals such as ethylene and propylene, achieving higher carbon efficiency and reducing coke formation.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting a mixture comprising (1) a feedstock of crude oil and/or heavy oil and/or residues, (2) water and/or steam, (3) hydrogen, (4) a solvent selective for dissolving asphaltene, in a processing unit, to conditions sufficient to convert at least some hydrocarbon molecules of the feedstock to molecules that have less carbon atoms than the at least some hydrocarbon molecules

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal hydro-processing:

Implementation Method 2

a solvent selective for dissolving asphaltene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvation: Solvation

Implementation Method 3

distilling, in the distillation column, the reactor unit effluent to produce: (1) a gas stream that comprises primarily C1 to C4 saturates, (2) a liquid product stream that comprises primarily saturates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 4

cracking the liquid stream to produce one or more of ethylene, propylene, butene, and benzene

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cracking: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11827857B2Conversion of heavy ends of crude oil or whole crude oil to high value chemicals using a combination of thermal hydroprocessing, hydrotreating with steam crackers under high severity conditions to maximize ethylene, propylene, butenes and benzene
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • US11827857B2 patent drawing
  • US11827857B2 patent drawing
  • US11827857B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for producing olefins and/or aromatics are disclosed. Methods disclosed includes thermal hydro-processing of crude oils and/or heavy oils and/or residues, in a thermal hydro-processing unit, to produce intermediate products, which can then be used to make valuable chemicals such as olefins and aromatics.