Thermodynamic Process Monitoring Using Statistical Performance Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current performance monitoring methods for thermodynamic devices and processes are outdated, relying on manufacturer design values rather than actual operating conditions, leading to inaccurate loss calculations and inefficient operation, particularly in fuel burning boilers where soot buildup affects heat transfer efficiency.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a statistical analysis-based system to evaluate achievable performance by collecting and analyzing real-time data, deriving correction functions from actual operating conditions, and using these to monitor and control thermodynamic processes, such as soot blowing in fuel burning boilers, to optimize efficiency and reduce costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manufacturer design values are used as reference for performance monitoring, then the monitoring system is simple to implement, but the accuracy of performance evaluation deteriorates due to device degradation and operational changes over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual device performance and using statistical analysis to update reference values over time. This creates a self-correcting mechanism where the monitoring system adapts to device degradation and operational changes, maintaining accuracy without requiring complex manual recalibration or replacement of reference data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the reference performance parameters from fixed manufacturer design values to statistically derived values that evolve with device operation. By using historical performance data to establish baseline parameters and continuously updating these based on actual operational statistics, the system maintains accuracy while keeping the implementation relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If statistical analysis of real-time data is implemented to determine achievable performance, then performance monitoring accuracy improves, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance monitoring accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically collecting operational data, conducting statistical analysis, and generating performance evaluations without requiring external intervention. The automated statistical processing uses standard algorithms to derive achievable performance metrics from historical data, reducing the need for complex manual analysis while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex manual performance evaluation methods with automated statistical analysis. By using computer-based algorithms to process operational data and determine achievable performance, the system achieves high monitoring accuracy while the computational complexity is managed through standardized statistical techniques rather than complex mechanical or manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If performance is monitored against theoretical design values, then the monitoring methodology remains consistent with original specifications, but the ability to detect actual performance losses deteriorates due to device aging and modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidoperating conditions stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static reference values to dynamic performance baselines that adapt to changing operating conditions and device states. By continuously analyzing historical data under varying operational parameters, the system maintains reliable detection capability even as the device ages or undergoes modifications, effectively tracking achievable performance rather than fixed theoretical values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary statistical analysis of historical performance data to establish baseline achievable performance before comparing current operations. This advance preparation creates a dynamic reference framework that accounts for device aging and operational changes, enabling reliable detection of actual performance losses without requiring continuous theoretical recalculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2444869B1Method and apparatus for generalized performance evaluation of equipment using achievable performance derived from statistics and real-time data
Publication Date: 2017.05.03 EMERSON PROCESS MANAGEMENT POWER & WATER SOLUTIONS INC
  • EP2444869B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2444869B1 patent drawingFigure 2~9
  • EP2444869B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of controlling a thermodynamic process is disclosed. The method comprises operating the process according to a first operational state for a first period of time, determining performance parameter values of the process during the first period of time, determining a performance parameter statistical value from the performance parameter values, and evaluating the performance parameter statistical value to determine a change in an operating parameter of the first operational state.