Thermoelectric Detector Deicing for Low-Noise X-Ray Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cooled radiation detectors in analytical instruments, such as electron microscopes, face contamination issues due to ice and oil condensation, which affect measurement accuracy and require lengthy warm-up cycles for decontamination.

Innovation Solution

A thermoelectric element with a heating power supply is used to quickly raise the temperature of the detector to a conditioning temperature, allowing for rapid removal of ice and oil condensates, while a separate cooling power supply maintains the detector at operating temperature for measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the detector is cooled to low temperatures to enhance measurement accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but ice and oil condensation form on the detector surface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidice and oil condensation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The detector system is divided into two separate chambers: a first chamber containing the cooled detector at low temperature for measurement, and a second chamber maintained at a higher temperature to prevent condensation. The detector can be moved between these chambers, allowing it to be cooled for measurement while protected from condensation during storage or non-measurement periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A temperature gradient is established between the two chambers, with the warmer second chamber acting as an intermediary environment that prevents condensation on the detector when it is not actively being measured. This intermediate warm chamber serves as a protective zone between the cold detector and the ambient environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If periodic warm-up cycles are used to remove ice condensation, then ice removal is achieved, but measurement time is lost and operational duration is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice removalVSAvoidoperational time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary warming of the detector in the second chamber before measurement cycles begin, or between measurement cycles, so that ice condensation is removed in advance. This prevents ice accumulation during actual measurement periods, maintaining operational continuity without interrupting data collection for warm-up cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detector is periodically moved between the cold first chamber for measurement and the warm second chamber for condensation removal. This periodic cycling allows ice removal to occur during dedicated warm periods without interrupting the measurement process in the cold chamber, separating the conflicting functions of cooling for measurement and warming for ice removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the detector is warmed to remove ice condensation, then ice is melted, but measurement noise increases and measurement quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveice removalVSAvoidmeasurement quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement function and ice removal function are separated into two different chambers with different temperature regimes. The first chamber maintains the detector at low temperature for high-quality measurements, while the second chamber provides warm temperature for ice removal. This spatial segmentation allows both functions to occur simultaneously without interfering with each other's quality requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables rapid and efficient removal of ice and oil condensates, reducing measurement noise and extending the operational time of the detector without the need for prolonged warm-up cycles.

Implementation Method 1

a thermoelectric element with a heating power supply is used to quickly raise the temperature of the detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermoelectric heating: Peltier Effect

Implementation Method 2

a separate cooling power supply maintains the detector at operating temperature for measurements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermoelectric cooling: Peltier Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2021830B1Deicing of radiation detectors in analytical instruments
Publication Date: 2016.08.03 THERMO ELECTRONICS SCI INSTR LLC
  • EP2021830B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an analytical instrument having a radiation detector, such as an electron microscope with an X-ray detector, a thermoelectric element (such as one or more Peltier junctions) is driven by a cooling power supply to cool the detector and thereby decrease measurement noise. Oil condensates and ice can then form on the detector owing to residual water vapor and vacuum pump oil in the analysis chamber, and these contaminants can interfere with measurement accuracy. To assist in reducing this problem, the thermoelectric element can be powered in the reverse of its cooling mode, thereby heating the detector and evaporating the contaminants. After the detector is cleared of contaminants, it may again be cooled and measurements may resume. Preferably, the thermoelectric element is heated by a power supply separate from the one that provides the cooling power, though it can also be possible to utilize a single power supply to provide both heating and cooling modes.