Thermoplastic Composite Articles with Retained Morphology

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing composite materials, such as Glass Mat Thermoplastic (GMT) composites, face challenges in processing and recycling due to the difference in material types between the glass reinforcement and thermoplastic matrix, leading to loss of mechanical properties like impact strength during heat history processes.

Innovation Solution

The development of intermediate forms with elongated members of thermoplastic materials, capable of being processed under elevated temperature and pressure, and optionally strain hardened, to form shaped composite articles with retained morphology and improved mechanical properties, using combinations of polyolefinic materials like propylene-based polymers, and employing minimal thermal treatments to preserve impact characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If consolidation step is performed to fuse thermoplastic fibers together, then the structural integrity is improved, but the morphology change increases and mechanical properties such as impact strength are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidimpact strength
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement form is pre-consolidated before the molding process, so that the fibers are already fused together in the desired configuration. This preliminary consolidation eliminates the need for subsequent heat treatment steps during molding, thereby preserving the mechanical properties while achieving structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a lower melting point thermoplastic material for the reinforcement form compared to the matrix material. This parameter difference allows the reinforcement form to be consolidated at a lower temperature that does not cause excessive morphology change, while still achieving sufficient structural integrity for the final composite article.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple heat history steps are applied for consolidation and forming, then the processing flexibility is improved, but the morphology change increases and mechanical properties are degraded

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing flexibilityVSAvoidmechanical properties
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the consolidation step and the molding step into a single integrated process. The pre-consolidated reinforcement form is placed in the mold and the matrix material is applied in one operation, eliminating the need for separate consolidation and forming steps. This merging reduces the total number of heat history steps while maintaining processing flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

By performing consolidation before molding, the patent prepares the reinforcement form in advance with the desired structure. This preliminary action allows the subsequent molding process to focus only on shaping and matrix application, reducing the total thermal processing history and preserving mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If inorganic reinforcement materials like glass fibers are used, then the strength is improved, but the recycling difficulty increases due to material type differences

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidrecycling difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses thermoplastic fibers as reinforcement material instead of inorganic glass fibers. Both the reinforcement and the matrix are thermoplastic materials, creating a homogeneous composite structure. This homogeneity allows for easier recycling and reprocessing compared to GMT composites with dissimilar materials, while maintaining the strength benefits of fiber reinforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system where both components are thermoplastic polymers. This choice of composite materials enables compatibility in recycling processes, as both reinforcement and matrix can be processed using similar thermal and mechanical methods, unlike heterogeneous GMT composites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for the production of composite articles with high retained morphology and improved mechanical properties, including impact strength, while enabling efficient recycling and reducing the need for additional heat history steps, thus overcoming the limitations of existing GMT materials.

Implementation Method 1

a surface portion capable of melting prior to an adjoining portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 2

strain hardened (i.e., strengthened or hardened by plastic deformation below the recrystallization temperature range)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStrain hardening: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9227346B2Plastic composite articles and methods of making same
Publication Date: 2016.01.05 DOW GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US9227346B2 patent drawing
  • US9227346B2 patent drawing
  • US9227346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reinforced composite article and method for making the same. The article and method employ at least one elongated plastic member as a reinforcement phase. An intermediate form including the elongated member is made and can be processed, for example, to form a composite article with a smooth exposed reinforcement surface.