Demand response technology utilizing a simulation engine to perform thermostat-based demand response simulations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Grid operators face challenges in managing electrical load during periods of high energy consumption, as they need to balance customer comfort with predictable load shedding, and existing solutions often result in fluctuating energy consumption patterns that affect both comfort and load management.

Innovation Solution

An energy management server connects with customer and energy provider systems to implement a control strategy for HVAC systems, using historical data and simulation engines to optimize demand response events, ensuring predictable load reduction while maintaining customer comfort through targeted thermostat adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional thermostat control is used to manage electrical load during high energy consumption periods, then customer comfort may be maintained, but predictable load shedding cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepredictable load sheddingVSAvoidcustomer comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pre-cooling of buildings before anticipated peak demand periods by lowering thermostat setpoints in advance. This stores cooling capacity in the building thermal mass, allowing HVAC systems to be reduced or shut off during peak periods while maintaining comfort, thus achieving predictable load shedding without sacrificing customer comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts thermostat setpoints and HVAC operation based on real-time grid conditions, weather forecasts, and building-specific thermal characteristics. This dynamic control enables the system to maintain comfort during non-peak periods while achieving predictable load reduction during peak periods, resolving the contradiction between reliability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If load management is implemented during high energy consumption periods, then electrical load can be controlled, but energy consumption patterns become fluctuating and unpredictable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload management controlVSAvoidenergy consumption pattern stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

By shifting energy consumption to off-peak periods through pre-cooling and advance HVAC scheduling, the system creates a more stable and predictable overall energy consumption pattern. The load is moved rather than simply reduced, maintaining stability while achieving better peak period control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors building temperature, outdoor conditions, grid demand signals, and HVAC performance to dynamically adjust control strategies. This feedback loop ensures that load management actions maintain stable energy consumption patterns while achieving productivity goals for load control during peak periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If thermostat adjustments are made to achieve load reduction, then energy consumption can be reduced during peak periods, but customer comfort may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepeak period energy consumptionVSAvoidcustomer comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pre-cooling before peak demand periods by lowering thermostat setpoints and running HVAC systems at elevated capacity. This stores thermal energy in building mass, allowing the system to reduce or suspend HVAC operation during peak periods while maintaining comfortable temperatures, thus reducing peak energy consumption without compromising comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes thermostat setpoint parameters dynamically based on the timing relative to peak demand events. During pre-cooling phases, setpoints are lowered below normal comfort ranges; during peak reduction phases, setpoints are adjusted to maintain comfort while minimizing energy use. These parameter changes enable energy reduction without permanent comfort compromise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11073849B1Demand response technology utilizing a simulation engine to perform thermostat-based demand response simulations
Publication Date: 2021.07.27 ENERGYHUB
  • US11073849B1 patent drawing
  • US11073849B1 patent drawing
  • US11073849B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for performing a thermostat-based demand response event. In one aspect, a method includes accessing, for sites, historical readings of HVAC activity, indoor temperature, and outdoor temperature and building a model for each of the sites using the historical readings of HVAC activity, indoor temperature, and outdoor temperature. The method also includes using a simulation engine to achieve a target load shed and load reduction shape for a thermostat-based demand response event, and performing the thermostat-based demand response event based on results of the simulation engine.