Thermostatic Load Control for Fast Grid Regulation Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Integrating large amounts of intermittent renewable energy into power grids poses challenges due to increased ramp-rate and magnitude requirements for continuous regulation reserves, which existing generators struggle to meet efficiently, leading to mechanical stress and reduced lifetimes. Additionally, demand-side management, particularly direct load control of thermostatically controlled appliances, faces challenges in providing fast-response ancillary services due to communication delays, errors, and bandwidth limitations, as well as the need for precise control and customer acceptance.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for controlling aggregated thermostatically controlled appliances (TCAs) involve formulating targeted load profiles, prioritizing TCAs based on operating temperatures, determining their on/off status, and sending command signals to manage their power consumption, using a centralized controller with a two-way communication network to optimize load management and reduce the number of units required for regulation services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If direct load control of thermostatically controlled appliances is used to provide fast-response ancillary services, then the response speed and controllability are improved, but communication delays and bandwidth limitations reduce the effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidcommunication delays
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-cools or pre-heats thermal energy storage devices before peak demand periods, storing thermal energy in advance. This preliminary action allows the load to respond immediately to control signals during critical periods without waiting for thermal response, effectively compensating for communication delays and achieving fast-response ancillary services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Power

If a large number of TCAs are aggregated to provide 1 MW regulation services, then the required regulation capacity is achieved, but the system complexity and communication burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregulation capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system aggregates multiple TCAs with thermal energy storage capabilities into a coordinated control group, merging their individual regulation capacities to achieve 1 MW total regulation service. By combining resources and implementing centralized intelligent control, the system reduces the number of individually managed units while maintaining required capacity, thereby lowering system complexity and communication overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of TCAs by adjusting setpoint temperatures and control strategies based on real-time grid conditions. This parameter optimization allows fewer units to provide the same regulation capacity more efficiently, reducing the total number of devices needed and simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If thermostat setpoints are frequently adjusted to follow regulation signals, then the regulation service quality is improved, but the TCA lifetime is shortened due to increased wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidTCA lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses thermal energy storage devices to cushion against frequent setpoint adjustments by maintaining temperature buffers. This beforehand cushioning allows the system to follow regulation signals while minimizing actual thermostat changes, reducing mechanical wear on TCA components and extending their operational lifetime while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Ease of operation

If ILC is used to control TCA power consumption based on external parameters, then consumer autonomy is improved, but the control precision and observability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsumer autonomyVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary control layer that translates consumer autonomy requirements into precise control actions. This intermediary layer uses intelligent algorithms to interpret consumer preferences and external parameters, then generates optimized control signals that achieve both consumer autonomy and precise control, bridging the gap between ILC simplicity and DLC precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS9362749B2Controller for thermostatically controlled loads
Publication Date: 2016.06.07 BATTELLE MEMORIAL INST
  • US9362749B2 patent drawing
  • US9362749B2 patent drawing
  • US9362749B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method of controlling aggregated thermostatically controlled appliances (TCAs) for demand response is disclosed. A targeted load profile is formulated and a forecasted load profile is generated. The TCAs within an “on” or “off” control group are prioritized based on their operating temperatures. The “on” or “off” status of the TCAs is determined. Command signals are sent to turn on or turn off the TCAs.