Thienoquinazoline PLK1 Inhibitors With Improved Selectivity and Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current PLK1 inhibitors, such as Onvansertib, while showing promise in clinical studies, face challenges in achieving high selectivity and stability for effective cancer treatment, particularly in tumors like colorectal cancer.

Innovation Solution

Development of 5,6-dihydrothieno[3,4-h]quinazoline compounds and their pharmaceutically acceptable salts, which selectively inhibit PLK1, offering improved inhibitory activity and stability for treating solid tumors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current PLK1 inhibitors like Onvansertib are used, then clinical benefit is achieved in cancer treatment, but selectivity and stability are insufficient for effective treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidtreatment efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical structure parameters of PLK1 inhibitors by introducing specific substituents at defined positions (R1-R6 groups with various options like halogen, alkyl, alkoxy, heteroaryl) to optimize the balance between selectivity and treatment efficacy. This structural parameter optimization enables the compound to achieve both high selectivity for PLK1 and improved therapeutic effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If current PLK1 inhibitors like Onvansertib are used, then clinical benefit is achieved in cancer treatment, but stability is insufficient for effective treatment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidtreatment efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes molecular stability parameters through strategic selection of chemically stable substituent groups (such as halogen atoms, saturated hydrocarbon groups, and heterocyclic groups) that resist metabolic degradation while maintaining biological activity, thereby achieving both stability and treatment efficacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If compound structure is optimized for better PLK1 inhibition, then inhibitory activity improves, but selectivity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinhibitory activityVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality optimization by introducing specific functional groups at particular positions (R1-R6) of the core thienoquinazoline structure, where each substituent is carefully selected to enhance inhibitory activity at the target binding site while maintaining overall molecular selectivity through localized structural modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent systematically varies substituent parameters (type, position, and combination of R1-R6 groups) to fine-tune the balance between inhibitory power and selectivity, using structure-activity relationship optimization to achieve high PLK1 inhibition with minimal off-target effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12577253B25,6-dihydrothieno[3,4-h]quinazoline compound
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 SHANGHAI FOSUN PHARMA DEV CO LTD
  • US12577253B2 patent drawing
  • US12577253B2 patent drawing
  • US12577253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a series of 5,6-dihydrothieno[3,4-h]quinazoline compounds as represented by formula (P) and pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, and the use of the compounds or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof in the preparation of solid tumor drugs, such as solid tumor drugs associated with selective PLK1 inhibitors.