Thin-Film Deposition Parameter Control for Target Film Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thin-film deposition techniques face challenges in ensuring that thin films are properly formed, leading to issues with integrated circuit performance and increased wafer scrapping due to non-target film parameters.

Innovation Solution

A thin-film deposition system utilizing machine learning to dynamically adjust process parameters, including fluid flow rates and chamber conditions, through a control system that analyzes historical data to predict and achieve target film thickness, composition, and crystal structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Length of moving object

If thin-film deposition techniques are used to form very thin films, then film thickness is reduced, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm thicknessVSAvoidfilm formation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts deposition parameters in real-time based on feedback from in-situ monitoring. The control system modifies process conditions during deposition to maintain film quality despite reducing thickness, transforming a static process into a dynamic adaptive one.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback control by continuously monitoring deposition progress and adjusting parameters accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that even as film thickness decreases, the formation quality remains within specifications through real-time corrections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traditional deposition control methods are used, then device complexity is low, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethin-film deposition reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system uses feedback from in-situ monitoring to continuously adjust deposition parameters, ensuring reliable film formation. This feedback loop compensates for variations in the deposition process, improving reliability despite the added system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying deposition parameters based on real-time monitoring data without requiring external intervention. This self-service capability enhances reliability while managing complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If static deposition parameters are used, then ease of operation is high, but manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm parameter controlVSAvoidprocess control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static to dynamic parameter control, automatically adjusting deposition conditions based on real-time feedback. This dynamic approach improves manufacturing precision while the automation maintains ease of operation by eliminating manual adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control system automatically manages parameter adjustments without requiring operator intervention, maintaining ease of operation while achieving high precision through continuous self-optimization based on in-situ monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If conventional deposition processes are used, then productivity is maintained, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebatch yieldVSAvoiddeposition process efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control to prevent defective film formation, reducing wafer scrapping and improving batch yield. By catching and correcting deviations early in the deposition process, the system maintains high reliability without significant productivity loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary adjustments to deposition parameters based on predicted outcomes from machine learning models, preventing defects before they occur. This proactive approach improves reliability by ensuring films meet specifications while maintaining productivity through avoided rework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures reliable thin-film deposition within target specifications, improving integrated circuit performance and reducing wafer scrapping by enhancing batch yields.

Implementation Method 1

various thin-film deposition techniques are implemented. These techniques can form very thin films

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Vapour Deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS20250320608A1System and method for dynamically adjusting thin-film deposition parameters
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US20250320608A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320608A1 patent drawing
  • US20250320608A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A thin-film deposition system deposits thin films on semiconductor wafers. The thin-film deposition system includes a machine learning based analysis model. The analysis model dynamically selects process conditions for a next deposition process by receiving static process conditions and target thin-film data. The analysis model identifies dynamic process conditions data that, together with the static process conditions data, result in predicted thin-film data that matches the target thin-film data. The deposition system then uses the static and dynamic process conditions data for the next thin-film deposition process.