Thin-Film Deposition Control Using Dynamic Parameter Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing thin-film deposition techniques face challenges in ensuring that thin films are properly formed, leading to issues with integrated circuit performance and increased wafer scrapping due to non-conforming film parameters.

Innovation Solution

A thin-film deposition system utilizing a control system with machine learning to dynamically adjust process parameters, including fluid flow rates and chamber conditions, based on historical data and real-time feedback from byproduct sensors to ensure thin films meet target specifications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If traditional thin-film deposition techniques are used, then deposition process can be performed, but film parameters (thickness, composition, crystal structure) cannot be consistently controlled within target specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm parameter controlVSAvoiddeposition process reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs byproduct sensors to monitor deposition byproducts in real-time and feeds this information back to the controller, which dynamically adjusts deposition parameters (fluid flow rates, chamber conditions) to maintain film parameters within target specifications, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and process reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The deposition system performs self-correction by automatically adjusting its own parameters based on real-time sensor feedback without external intervention, enabling consistent film formation and improving both precision and reliability simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If deposition parameters are kept static, then process simplicity is maintained, but film parameters vary outside target specifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm parameter consistencyVSAvoiddeposition system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static deposition parameters to dynamic parameter adjustment, where the controller continuously modifies fluid flow rates and chamber conditions based on real-time sensor data, achieving consistent film parameters while managing complexity through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes deposition parameters (flow rates, chamber conditions) during the deposition process based on monitored byproduct levels, enabling precise film parameter control without requiring overly complex external intervention systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If dynamic parameter adjustment is implemented, then film parameters are controlled within specifications, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm formation reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller receives real-time feedback from byproduct sensors and automatically adjusts deposition parameters, creating a closed-loop system that improves film formation reliability while containing complexity within the control system rather than requiring complex external monitoring and adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances the reliability of thin-film deposition, improving integrated circuit performance and reducing wafer scrapping by ensuring consistent film thickness, composition, and crystal structure within target parameters.

Implementation Method 1

various thin-film deposition techniques are implemented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Vapour Deposition: Physical Vapour Deposition

Implementation Method 2

various thin-film deposition techniques are implemented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical Vapour Deposition: Chemical Vapour Deposition

Data Source

PatentUS12371791B2System and method for dynamically adjusting thin-film deposition parameters
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US12371791B2 patent drawing
  • US12371791B2 patent drawing
  • US12371791B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A thin-film deposition and method deposits thin films on semiconductor wafers. The thin-film deposition utilizes an analysis model that dynamically selects process conditions for a next deposition process by receiving static process conditions and target thin-film data. The analysis model identifies dynamic process conditions data that, together with the static process conditions data, result in predicted thin-film data that matches the target thin-film data. The deposition method then uses the static and dynamic process conditions data for the next thin-film deposition process.