Thin-Skin Membrane Mold for Composite Resin Temperature Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current injection molding processes are costly and complex, with a need for improved temperature control and reduced production cycle time, especially during endothermic and exothermic processes, and a desire for a more efficient and easier-to-operate apparatus.

Innovation Solution

The use of thin-skin, semi-rigid membranes attached to rigid mold sections to create gas-tight chambers filled with a backing gas, which supports the membranes during resin injection and allows for precise temperature control and monitoring, along with sensors to optimize the molding process, including the injection of molding fluid and feedback mechanisms to adjust parameters in real-time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional injection molding processes are used, then manufacturing capability is maintained, but production cycle time is extended and temperature control is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction cycle timeVSAvoidtemperature control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The mold is segmented into multiple independent heating zones with individual temperature control, allowing different regions to be optimized for specific process requirements. This enables simultaneous endothermic and exothermic processes to be controlled independently, reducing overall cycle time while maintaining precise temperature control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Temperature sensors are integrated throughout the mold to provide real-time feedback to the control system. This closed-loop feedback mechanism continuously monitors and adjusts heating element output, enabling rapid response to temperature variations and optimizing both production cycle time and temperature control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If complex molding apparatus are used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearticle qualityVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple functions are merged into integrated components: heating elements are embedded within the mold structure itself rather than being separate external units, temperature sensors are built into the mold cavities, and control systems are consolidated into a single interface. This integration maintains manufacturing precision while reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The mold design incorporates universal components that serve multiple functions: the rigid mold sections provide both structural support and heating surfaces, membranes serve as both release agents and temperature sensors, and the control system manages both heating and cooling processes. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If traditional molding processes are used, then process capability is maintained, but energy efficiency is reduced and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost-effectivenessVSAvoidenergy efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mold and membranes are preheated to optimal temperatures before injection begins. This preliminary heating action reduces the energy required during the actual molding process and eliminates cycle time delays that would occur if heating had to occur during production, thereby improving both energy efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts temperature, pressure, and heating power parameters based on real-time process conditions and material properties. By optimizing these parameters for each specific molding operation, the system minimizes energy consumption while maintaining high productivity and cost-effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in a more efficient and cost-effective injection molding process with improved article quality, reduced cycle time, and enhanced thermal communication, allowing for better control over endothermic and exothermic processes, while also reducing stress on the molding surfaces and improving resin flow.

Implementation Method 1

filling and pressurizing the first and second chambers with a gas backing at a gas pressure level

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

improved thermal communication, allowing for better control over endothermic and exothermic processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 3

endothermic and exothermic processes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExothermic reaction: Exothermic Reaction

Data Source

PatentUS7553435B2Method and apparatus for molding composite articles
Publication Date: 2009.06.30 WABASH NATIONAL CORP
  • US7553435B2 patent drawing
  • US7553435B2 patent drawing
  • US7553435B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for molding composite articles can include a pair of opposed mold sections having first and second molding membranes that define a mold plenum. The mold sections have a thin-skin mold section configuration. Each mold section can be filled with a gas backing. The temperature of the mold plenum can be controlled by regulating the temperature of the gas backing.