Thixotropic Adhesive Interface for MEMS Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Adhesives used in micro electro mechanical systems (MEMS) often exhibit unsuitable rheological properties, leading to co-mingling of conductive and non-conductive adhesives, resulting in wide variance in conductance properties and less than optimum performance of Fast Scan MEMS devices.

Innovation Solution

A structural adhesive interface is implemented, comprising a conductive structural adhesive portion and a non-conductive structural adhesive portion that surrounds it, with both having a thixotropy index greater than one, along with specific properties such as high viscosity and shear strength, to control flow and prevent co-mingling during deposition and curing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional adhesives with low thixotropy index are used, then the adhesive flows easily during deposition, but the conductive and non-conductive adhesives co-mingle, resulting in wide variance in conductance properties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive depositionVSAvoidadhesive pattern definition
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the rheological parameters of the adhesive by specifying a thixotropy index greater than one, which transforms the adhesive's flow behavior to prevent co-mingling while maintaining depositability. This parameter change resolves the contradiction between ease of deposition and pattern definition precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite adhesive system comprising both conductive and non-conductive adhesive portions with specific rheological properties. The composite structure allows the adhesive to maintain its shape and prevent co-mingling while still providing the necessary conductivity where required, resolving the contradiction between manufacturability and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If adhesive with high flowability is used, then deposition is easy, but the adhesive spreads excessively and loses structural integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive applicationVSAvoidstructural adhesive strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies a thixotropy index greater than one, which creates a time-dependent viscosity change. The adhesive remains fluid during application for ease of manufacture, then develops higher viscosity over time to maintain structural integrity, resolving the contradiction between ease of application and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conductive and non-conductive adhesives are mixed, then a single adhesive formulation is simpler, but the conductance properties vary widely and performance is suboptimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive formulationVSAvoidconductance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the adhesive into distinct conductive and non-conductive portions with different formulations. This segmentation allows each portion to perform its specific function optimally while maintaining consistent conductance properties in the conductive areas, resolving the contradiction between formulation simplicity and conductance reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different adhesive formulations to different locations within the bonding interface. Conductive adhesive is applied where electrical connection is needed, while non-conductive adhesive is applied where insulation is required. This local differentiation resolves the contradiction between overall formulation simplicity and localized conductance consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances the rheological properties of the adhesives, ensuring consistent conductance and improved performance of MEMS devices by preventing excessive flow and co-mingling, thereby achieving better flex capability and stability.

Implementation Method 1

The conductive structural adhesive portion and the non-conductive structural adhesive portion have a thixotropy index greater than one

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThixotropy: Thixotropy

Data Source

PatentUS10962766B2Adhesive bonded micro electro mechanical system
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10962766B2 patent drawing
  • US10962766B2 patent drawing
  • US10962766B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A micro electro mechanical system is provided. The micro electro mechanical system includes a first part bonded to a second part by a structural adhesive interface. The structural adhesive interface includes a conductive structural adhesive portion, and a non-conductive structural adhesive portion at least partially surrounding the conductive structural adhesive portion. The conductive structural adhesive portion and the non-conductive structural adhesive portion have a thixotropy index greater than one.