Thread Engagement Verification via Torque Gradient Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for checking the engagement of threads during assembly are often insufficient, leading to potential errors in ensuring proper contact and engagement of correctly formed threads, and require operator intervention with multiple wedges for different diameters, resulting in inefficiencies and incorrect rejections.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the measurement of torque and axial displacement or angle during tightening, followed by analysis of torque gradients to determine if full threads are engaged and if contact is correct, using reference functions for correct and incorrect assemblies, allowing real-time verification without the need for multiple wedges.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple wedges for different diameters are used to check thread engagement, then checking accuracy is improved, but device complexity and operator burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread engagement checking accuracyVSAvoidnumber of wedges required
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a single wedge that can check multiple diameter sizes through a standardized interface system. The wedge incorporates a universal checking mechanism that adapts to different bolt diameters without requiring multiple specialized wedges, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining checking accuracy across various sizes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying the wedge geometry and positioning parameters to accommodate different diameter measurements. The wedge design allows adjustment of checking parameters such as insertion depth, contact point position, and angular orientation to match different bolt diameters, enabling one wedge to perform multiple size-specific functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If traditional wedge checking is used, then thread engagement can be verified, but operator time and manual intervention increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly quality verificationVSAvoidoperator intervention time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by designing the wedge checking system to automatically indicate thread engagement status without requiring operator interpretation. The wedge incorporates visual or tactile indicators that self-evaluate the engagement condition and provide immediate feedback, allowing the assembly process to verify quality without continuous operator attention or manual measurement interpretation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical checking with an automated indication system. Instead of requiring the operator to manually assess wedge positioning and interpret engagement status, the system uses mechanical indicators such as color-coded zones, raised markings, or integrated gauges that automatically communicate the checking result, eliminating time-consuming manual evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If non-standard wedges are used for specific cases, then checking accuracy improves, but ease of operation deteriorates due to needing multiple specialized tools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechecking accuracy for specific casesVSAvoidoperator convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a standardized wedge design that handles both standard and non-standard cases through a single tool. The universal wedge incorporates adjustable features or multiple checking points that adapt to various thread configurations, eliminating the need for operators to select from multiple specialized wedges while maintaining precision for each specific case

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures correct engagement of threads and prevents contact with transitional portions, reducing operator intervention and assembly errors, while providing real-time verification and reducing unnecessary dismantling.

Implementation Method 1

a stage of measuring at least one torque from a tightening torque and a reaction torque in the threaded fastener

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque measurement: Torque

Implementation Method 2

a stage of measuring another parameter, other than torque, preferably a time, an axial displacement or again an angle of rotation between the first and second components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAxial displacement measurement: Displacement

Data Source

PatentUS9500544B2Process for checking that full threads are engaged in tightening and assembly
Publication Date: 2016.11.22 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US9500544B2 patent drawing
  • US9500544B2 patent drawing
  • US9500544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for checking when tightening a threaded fastener that it has been tightened on the complete threads of the fastener. In order to do this the process comprises detecting different gradients in a tightening graph representing torque as a function of another parameter and comparing each gradient with predetermined values. According to the portions of graph detected and their gradient values it is possible to determine whether tightening is correct and has taken place on the complete threads of the fastener, or if not it is possible to identify a cause of failure.