Thread Milling Insert Layout for Accurate Two-Sided Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional thread milling tools with double-sided inserts face challenges in maintaining accurate positioning and preventing incorrect mounting, leading to potential tolerance issues and reduced efficiency due to the need for repositioning worn-out cutting edges in the same insert seat.

Innovation Solution

The design features a thread milling tool with angularly and axially offset insert seats, allowing each insert to have a single axial abutment surface for both working positions, ensuring correct mounting and grinding tolerances, and incorporating mirror symmetry and asymmetry to facilitate easy adaptation and prevention of incorrect positioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If thread milling inserts are repositioned in the same insert seat after wear, then the insert useful life is extended, but positioning accuracy and tolerance control deteriorate due to repeated mounting in the same seat

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert useful lifeVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The tool body is divided into multiple insert seats arranged at different axial positions along the longitudinal axis. Each seat is designed with specific axial offset to accommodate inserts at precise locations, enabling accurate positioning when inserts are mounted in different seats rather than repositioned in the same seat.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of repositioning inserts within the same seat (two-dimensional movement), the invention utilizes the axial dimension by providing multiple seats at different axial positions. Inserts are mounted in different axial positions to extend useful life, transforming the problem from in-seat repositioning to inter-seat relocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple insert seats are provided at different axial positions, then positioning accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional seats and offset arrangements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidtool body structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple insert seats are designed with identical structural features and mounting mechanisms, allowing each seat to perform the same function of holding and positioning an insert. The seats differ only in their axial positions, enabling standardized manufacturing while achieving precise positioning through spatial arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If insert seats are axially offset from each other, then vibrations are reduced through favorable insert distribution, but the complexity of ensuring correct insert orientation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovevibrationsVSAvoidinsert mounting
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Each insert is designed with asymmetric features including a single axial abutment surface at one end and mirror-asymmetric side surfaces. The insert seats correspondingly have asymmetric receiving features that match the insert geometry, ensuring that inserts can only be mounted in the correct orientation. This asymmetric design prevents incorrect mounting while maintaining simple operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

4Manufacturing precision

If a single axial abutment surface is used for both working positions, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but the insert design complexity increases due to mirror symmetry and asymmetry requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding toleranceVSAvoidinsert geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The insert employs a combination of symmetry and asymmetry: mirror symmetry in the cutting edge geometry allows both sides to perform identical cutting functions, while asymmetric features (single axial abutment surface, mirror-asymmetric side surfaces) ensure correct orientation and prevent incorrect mounting. This balanced approach maintains precision while managing design complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS20240001466A1Thread milling tool and thread milling insert
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 SECO TOOLS AB
  • US20240001466A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001466A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001466A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A thread milling tool includes a tool body with at least one pair of insert seats including of a first insert seat and a second insert seat, which are angularly and axially offset from each other, and several double-sided thread milling inserts. Each thread milling inserts is adapted to the first and second insert seats such that it is mountable in the first insert seat in one single working position with a first group of cutting edges on a first side of the thread milling insert in an active cutting position, and mountable in the second insert seat in one single working position with a second group of cutting edges on an opposite second side of the thread milling insert in an active cutting position. A thread milling insert suitable for use in such a thread milling tool is also provided.