Threaded Fluid Coupling With Torque-Triggered Sealing Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Threaded couplings for fluid conduits often fail to ensure a complete connection, leading to leaks due to inadequate tightening, as operators may hand-tighten connections that pass initial inspections but fail under operational pressures, and existing methods for verifying torque are prone to errors or erasure.

Innovation Solution

A threaded coupling design featuring an interference member that prevents complete sealing unless a predefined load is applied, using mechanisms such as an annular sleeve, pins, biasing members, stops, or pressure-sensitive materials to ensure the connection is only secure when the required torque is met, preventing leaks during initial inspection and operational conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional torque monitoring and marking methods are used, then the connection can be tightened to the desired torque, but the indication of complete connection may be wrong due to operator errors or erasure by subsequent processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque measurement accuracyVSAvoidconnection completion indication reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling mechanism performs self-verification through the interference member's automatic engagement state. The interference member itself serves as both the torque application mechanism and the verification indicator, eliminating the need for separate marking operations that are prone to human error and erasure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The interference member provides immediate feedback on whether the required torque has been applied. When the interference member disengages from the blocking position, it visually or mechanically indicates that sufficient torque has been applied, creating a direct feedback loop between the tightening action and the verification state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If hand-tightening is used to simplify operation, then initial inspection may pass, but the coupling will leak under normal operating pressures and cyclical loading

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling tightening easeVSAvoidconnection sealing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The interference member is designed to actively prevent complete sealing engagement until the required torque is applied. It creates a mechanical barrier that blocks the sealing surfaces from making full contact, thereby preemptively preventing the false sense of security that hand-tightening might provide during initial inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The interference member must be overcome during the tightening process before sealing can occur. This preliminary action requirement ensures that sufficient torque is applied before the coupling can achieve its sealed state, preventing under-tightening from passing inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If an interference member is added to prevent under-tightening, then connection reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection sealing reliabilityVSAvoidcoupling structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interference member serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as a torque threshold enforcement mechanism, a verification indicator, and a sealing control element. By combining these functions into a single component, the design adds minimal complexity while achieving multiple reliability objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The interference member is integrated with the existing coupling structure, merging the verification function with the sealing mechanism. Rather than adding a separate verification device, the interference member is combined with the sealing elements, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliability improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures a leak-free connection under both initial inspection and operational pressures by requiring a specific torque for complete sealing, preventing hand-tightened couplings from leaking and ensuring consistent quality assurance.

Implementation Method 1

The annular sleeve may be frictionally held to the body portion. When the load on the sleeve meets or exceeds the predefined amount, a friction force between the sleeve and the body portion is overcome to allow the sleeve to move relative to the body portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the interference member includes a biasing member having a predefined spring force which allows the biasing member to move or deflect relative to the body portion by a predetermined amount in response to the load on the biasing member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11320069B2Threaded coupling with under-torque prevention
Publication Date: 2022.05.03 PARKER INTANGIBLES LLC
  • US11320069B2 patent drawing
  • US11320069B2 patent drawing
  • US11320069B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A threaded coupling for ensuring a complete connection between fluid conduits includes a body portion of a fluid conduit, an axially forward sealing surface, a thread, and an interference member. The interference member is disposed on the body portion and is engageable with a portion of another fluid conduit to apply a load on the interference member when the fluid conduits are threadably connected together. The interference member is configured to prevent a complete sealing engagement between the fluid conduits when the load on the interference member is less than a predefined amount, and is configured to allow the complete sealing engagement between the fluid conduits when the load on the interference member meets or exceeds the predetermined amount.