Threaded Rebar Coupler Structure Without Diameter Enlargement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing threaded reinforcing bar couplings for deformed reinforcing bars in reinforced concrete face challenges such as decreased proof stress due to male threaded portion processing, increased manufacturing costs, and lower productivity in mass production, particularly due to the need for large diameter portion formation and adjustments in pitch during roll forming.

Innovation Solution

A threaded reinforcing bar coupling structure featuring a pair of reinforcing bars with a screw tubular coupler, where at least one reinforcing bar has a male threaded portion with a larger thread ridge diameter and smaller thread groove diameter than the main body, formed by rolling without preprocessing, allowing for connection without diameter enlargement and simplifying bar arrangement and construction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a male threaded portion is formed on a reinforcing bar by cutting, then the threaded portion can be created, but proof stress or strength decreases due to partial loss of cross-section

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreaded portion formationVSAvoidproof stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the formation method from cutting to rolling, and further optimizes by controlling the thread ridge diameter to be larger than the base diameter. This parameter change allows the threaded portion to gain strength through work hardening during rolling, compensating for the cross-sectional area reduction and achieving proof stress equal to or greater than the base portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If a large diameter portion is provided on the reinforcing bar to roll a male thread, then proof stress is maintained, but manufacturing costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproof stressVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates the need for large diameter portions by changing the thread formation parameters. By rolling threads directly on the base diameter portion and controlling the thread ridge diameter to be larger than the base diameter, the invention achieves sufficient proof stress without the additional cost of creating large diameter portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If roll forming is used to create large diameter portions, then manufacturing is simplified, but pitch errors occur requiring position adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelarge diameter portion formationVSAvoidpitch accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the large diameter portion formation step entirely from the manufacturing process. By rolling threads directly on the base diameter portion with controlled thread ridge diameter, the invention removes the source of pitch errors and the subsequent position adjustment requirements, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of manufacture

If the thread groove diameter is smaller than the reinforcing bar main body diameter, then the threaded portion can be formed, but cross-sectional area decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreaded portion formationVSAvoidproof stress
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the critical parameter of thread ridge diameter to be larger than the base diameter, which compensates for the cross-sectional area reduction caused by the smaller thread groove diameter. The work hardening effect during rolling further increases the strength, ensuring that the threaded portion achieves proof stress equal to or greater than the base portion despite the reduced cross-sectional area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration maintains sufficient proof stress by compensating for the decrease in thread groove diameter with increased hardness from work hardening, reduces manufacturing costs, and enhances productivity by eliminating the need for large-scale preprocessing and grout filling, while allowing for adjustable lengths and simplified construction processes.

Implementation Method 1

the male threaded portion has hardness or tensile strength greater than that of a remaining portion of the reinforcing bar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork hardening: Shock Hardening

Data Source

PatentUS11274446B2Screw-type rebar joint structure of deformed rebar and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 FUKUDA AKIRA
  • US11274446B2 patent drawing
  • US11274446B2 patent drawing
  • US11274446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A threaded reinforcing bar coupling structure comprises a pair of reinforcing bars and a tubular coupler connecting the pair of reinforcing bars. Each of the reinforcing bars is a deformed reinforcing bar having spiral node portions on an outer periphery of a reinforcing bar main body having a round shaft shape. A cylindrical portion with node portions removed is formed on an end portion of the reinforcing bar, and a male threaded portion is formed on the cylindrical portion. The male threaded portion has hardness or tensile strength greater than that of a remaining portion of the reinforcing bar. The pair of reinforcing bars is connected by the screw tubular coupler that is screwed onto the male threaded portions.