Threaded Shaft Sorbite Structure for Precision Rolling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing mechanical structural members, such as ball threaded shafts and gears, face challenges in achieving high precision and dimensional accuracy due to variations in hardness and metal structure, leading to increased complexity and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving refining steel materials to achieve a sorbite structure with Rockwell hardness between 13 to 28 HRC and a hardness variation within 6 HRC, without annealing, and performing plastic working to form grooves and teeth, ensuring uniform hardness and reduced tool wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If conventional heat treatment (quenching/tempering) is performed on round bar material, then hardness and strength are improved, but hardness uniformity and structural uniformity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidhardness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the heat treatment parameters by performing quenching at 850-950°C followed by tempering at 500-650°C to obtain a sorbite structure with uniform hardness distribution. This specific parameter combination resolves the contradiction by achieving both high hardness (HRC 25-35) and uniform hardness variation (≤6 HRC)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention utilizes phase transition of steel by controlling the transformation from austenite to sorbite structure through controlled quenching and tempering. This phase transition enables the material to achieve uniform microstructure and hardness distribution, resolving the contradiction between strength improvement and hardness uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

2Ease of manufacture

If annealing treatment is performed before rolling to improve workability, then machinability is improved, but manufacturing complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveworkabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the heat treatment process with the rolling process by performing quenching and tempering to achieve sorbite structure before rolling. This combination eliminates the need for separate annealing treatment, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining good workability for rolling (hardness HRC 25-35 provides optimal balance between strength and ductility)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary heat treatment (quenching and tempering) before rolling to create the optimal sorbite structure. This preliminary action prepares the material with uniform hardness and appropriate ductility, enabling successful rolling without requiring additional annealing treatment afterward

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple heat treatment processes (annealing, nitriding, sulfur-nitriding) are performed to improve precision, then surface hardness and durability are improved, but productivity decreases due to increased processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedimensional accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies partial hardening action by forming a hardened layer (5-20 μm) on the groove surface through controlled rolling with hardened rolls. This partial hardening is sufficient to achieve the required precision and durability without requiring excessive hardening treatments like multiple nitriding or sulfur-nitriding processes, thus maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Productivity

If thread grooves are formed by rolling to improve productivity, then manufacturing efficiency is improved, but tool wear increases due to material hardness variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidtool life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameters by achieving uniform hardness distribution (variation ≤6 HRC) through controlled heat treatment before rolling. This parameter optimization ensures consistent material properties that reduce unpredictable tool wear during rolling, extending tool life while maintaining high rolling productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach results in high-precision mechanical structural members with improved processing accuracy and reduced manufacturing costs, enhancing productivity and quality.

Implementation Method 1

the steel materials are subjected to refining by heat treatment (quenching/tempering) to improve machinability, grindability, toughness, wear resistance

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment (quenching/tempering): Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

a method of refining a round bar material to have a hardness of HRC25 to HRC35, annealing an outer circumferential surface thereof to have a hardness of HRC23 or less

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase transformation to sorbite structure: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

grooves and teeth are formed by plastic working and a hardened layer is formed on a surface of the teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Implementation Method 4

a hardened layer is formed on a surface of the teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWork hardening: Shock Hardening

Data Source

PatentUS20240335914A1Mechanical structural member and method for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2024.10.10 NSK STEERING & CONTROL INC
  • US20240335914A1 patent drawing
  • US20240335914A1 patent drawing
  • US20240335914A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a mechanical structural member that can suppress deformation and has high precision and excellent quality. In a mechanical structural member (triangular threaded shaft 31) in which grooves (32) and teeth (33) are formed by plastic working and a hardened layer (31a) is formed on a surface of the teeth (33), the mechanical structural member has a sorbite structure, and Rockwell hardness in a region P excluding the hardened layer (31a) is 13 to 28 (HRC). A variation in the Rockwell hardness in the region P excluding the hardened layer (31a) is within 6 (HRC).