Threat Classification in Streaming Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing prevalence of malware and cyberattacks poses a significant challenge in determining whether a program is malicious, as existing security measures often struggle to detect obfuscated or disguised hostile software, leading to time-consuming and resource-intensive processes.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates recommendation data to protect data streams from potential security threats by aggregating event data, assigning unique identifiers, and comparing similarities, thereby identifying potential threats and reducing urgent alerts, while implementing File Integrity Monitoring and threat analysis services to enhance security.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional malware detection methods are used, then security coverage is provided, but detection time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoiddetection time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing threat indicators and maintaining updated threat intelligence databases before malware infections occur. Threat classification models are trained in advance on known malware patterns, enabling rapid matching against new samples without performing exhaustive analysis from scratch, thus reducing detection time while maintaining security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including a threat classification module that acts as a mediator between raw event data and security responses. This intermediary layer processes and classifies events using learned patterns, filtering out benign activities and prioritizing genuine threats, thereby reducing detection time without compromising security reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive security analysis is performed on all events, then detection accuracy improves, but system resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by differentiating the level of analysis based on event characteristics and threat probability. High-confidence events receive minimal processing, while low-confidence or novel events trigger comprehensive analysis. This selective deep-dive approach maintains detection accuracy for critical threats while significantly reducing overall computational resource consumption compared to uniform comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by applying comprehensive security analysis only to a subset of events that meet certain criteria (e.g., novel patterns, high risk scores, or specific file types). The majority of routine events are processed using lighter-weight classification methods, achieving sufficient detection accuracy for critical cases while optimizing resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If threat detection sensitivity is increased, then more malware is detected, but false positive alerts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalware detection rateVSAvoidfalse positive alerts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detected threats and false positives are continuously fed back into the threat classification model for retraining. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from past decisions, refine its patterns recognition, and adjust sensitivity thresholds dynamically, thereby maintaining high malware detection rates while progressively reducing false positive alerts through iterative improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting detection thresholds and sensitivity levels based on contextual information and evolving threat landscapes. The system can shift between conservative and aggressive detection modes, adapting parameters such as confidence thresholds, pattern matching strictness, and risk score cutoffs to balance detection rate and false positive reduction in different operational contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12261890B2Threat classification in a streaming system
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 CROWDSTRIKE
  • US12261890B2 patent drawing
  • US12261890B2 patent drawing
  • US12261890B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for identifying data usable for generating security recommendations are discussed herein. A system can determine unique identifiers for events associated with a data stream and determine a frequency of different events occurring in the data stream. The system can generate recommendation data usable for defending the data stream from future malicious events based on a number of similar events occurring over a time period.