Threat Detection System Routing via Dialing Plans

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional threat detection systems face challenges in efficiently routing requests for assistance in network environments, leading to delays and inefficiencies in connecting screening operators with remote experts, and they are limited by the requirement for remote experts to be physically located at a single operations center, restricting scalability and integration of third-party experts.

Innovation Solution

A threat detection system that automatically routes requests to a hierarchy of expert groups based on predefined dialing plans, allowing remote experts to be located anywhere and enabling efficient communication and collaboration between operators and experts, while allowing for the integration of new experts and locations without geographical constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If remote experts are physically located at a single operations center, then connection establishment is simplified, but system scalability and integration of third-party experts is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration of third-party expertsVSAvoidphysical location requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical requirement of physical co-location with a network-based virtual connection system. Experts can be geographically distributed and accessed through network connections, eliminating the need for physical presence at a single operations center while maintaining system functionality and scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of time

If manual routing of requests to experts is used, then system complexity is reduced, but time delay in connecting operators with experts increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime delay in connectionVSAvoidrequest routing automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements predefined dialing plans that establish hierarchical routing paths in advance. When a request is received, the system automatically follows the pre-configured sequence to route the request to appropriate expert groups, eliminating manual intervention and reducing connection time through automated preliminary routing decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the status and availability of expert groups are continuously monitored. This feedback information is used to dynamically adjust request routing in real-time, ensuring that requests are directed to available experts efficiently and reducing waiting time through adaptive automated routing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If a single hierarchy of expert groups is used for all requests, then device complexity is reduced, but request handling efficiency for different locations and threat types decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverequest handling efficiencyVSAvoiddialing plan configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the expert groups into multiple hierarchical levels and categories, each specialized for specific threat types or geographic locations. This segmentation allows the system to route different types of requests to appropriate specialized groups, improving handling efficiency while organizing complexity through structured categorization rather than monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements location-specific and threat-type-specific routing configurations. Different dialing plans can be applied to different geographic locations or threat categories, allowing optimized local routing decisions for each specific context while maintaining overall system coherence through standardized hierarchical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Loss of time

If multiple separate requests are submitted to connect with different experts, then expert selection flexibility is improved, but time delay and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for multiple request submissionsVSAvoidexpert selection options
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal request handling mechanism that can accommodate multiple expert selection criteria within a single hierarchical routing framework. The dialing plans are designed to handle various routing scenarios (different locations, threat types, expert availabilities) through a unified automated process, eliminating the need for multiple separate requests while maintaining flexibility in expert selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS9306970B2Systems and methods for facilitating remote security threat detection
Publication Date: 2016.04.05 MICHAEL STAPLETON ASSOC LTD
  • US9306970B2 patent drawing
  • US9306970B2 patent drawing
  • US9306970B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for detecting security threats in a network environment. A local workstation is used to inspect an item and submit a request for assistance to determine whether the item raises a security threat. A server receives the request for assistance from the local workstation over a network and retrieves a dialing plan associated with the origin of the request. The server utilizes the dialing plan to route the request to expert groups assigned to the dialing group. In response to the request being accepted by a remote expert device in one of the expert groups, the server establishes a connection between the local workstation and the remote expert device that accepted the request.