Threat Detection Housing with Automated Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing threat detection systems in public places face challenges in efficiently and safely isolating individuals carrying dangerous objects, as they require constant monitoring and screening, which is taxing and may lead to safety failures.

Innovation Solution

A threat detection and isolation system with a housing that includes sensors for detecting dangerous objects, a door that locks upon detection, and features like a keypad for emergency release, wireless notification, and a bulletproof design to safely detain individuals until security measures can be implemented.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If constant monitoring and screening of every individual is implemented, then public safety is improved, but operational complexity and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublic safetyVSAvoidmonitoring and screening operations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service threat detection by automatically scanning individuals as they pass through the housing. Sensors detect dangerous objects without requiring manual inspection, and the system autonomously triggers door locking and emergency notifications when threats are detected, eliminating the need for constant human monitoring while maintaining high safety standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual monitoring and screening operations are replaced with automated sensor systems. Metal detectors, chemical sensors, and other detection devices automatically identify dangerous objects, substituting human operators with mechanical and electronic systems that provide consistent, fatigue-free monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If manual monitoring and screening are used, then operational flexibility is maintained, but response time to threats increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual monitoring flexibilityVSAvoidresponse time to threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of dangerous objects as individuals enter the housing, before any threat can materialize. Sensors continuously scan for metal objects, chemicals, and other hazards, and the door locking mechanism is pre-positioned to engage immediately upon threat detection, eliminating response delays associated with manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system operates continuously without interruption as individuals pass through the housing. Sensors maintain constant surveillance for dangerous objects, and the automated response system ensures uninterrupted detection and immediate action, eliminating the gaps and delays inherent in manual monitoring cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Reliability

If automated door locking is implemented upon threat detection, then public safety is improved, but individual freedom is restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepublic safetyVSAvoidrestriction of individual freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system converts the potentially harmful restriction of individual freedom into a benefit by using automated, objective threat detection. Only individuals carrying detected dangerous objects trigger the door locking mechanism, while all other persons experience normal passage. This transforms what could be seen as an infringement on freedom into a targeted safety measure that actually protects individual rights by avoiding false restrictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from sensor detection to control door locking. The door only locks when sensors provide positive feedback confirming the presence of dangerous objects. This feedback mechanism ensures that freedom restrictions are applied only when objectively warranted by detected threats, maintaining the balance between safety and individual liberty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively isolates and secures individuals carrying dangerous objects, ensuring public safety by automatically locking the door and alerting emergency services, allowing for controlled release once the threat is mitigated.

Implementation Method 1

In some embodiments, at least one sensor comprises a metal detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMetal detection:

Implementation Method 2

In another embodiment, at least one sensor comprises a chemical sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical sensing:

Implementation Method 3

a lock is configured to engage the door, thereby preventing the door from moving to an open position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical locking: Mechanical Fastener

Implementation Method 4

In some embodiments, a speaker is configured to emit an audible alert upon actuation of the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroacoustic conversion:

Implementation Method 5

In another embodiment, a light is disposed on an interior of the upper wall, the light configured to illuminate upon actuation of the sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Data Source

PatentUS11823545B2Threat detection and isolation system
Publication Date: 2023.11.21 HILL LIONEL
  • US11823545B2 patent drawing
  • US11823545B2 patent drawing
  • US11823545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A threat detection and isolation system is provided. The system includes a housing having an upper wall and a plurality of sidewalls extending therefrom defining an interior volume. A door is affixed to the housing on at least one of the plurality of sidewalls, the door providing access to the interior volume. A camera is disposed within the housing. At least one sensor is disposed within the housing, wherein the sensor can detect the presence of a predefined dangerous object within the interior volume. Upon detection of the presence of the predefined dangerous object, the door moves to a closed position and a lock engages the door, thereby preventing the door from moving to an open position. In some embodiments, a notification is sent to emergency services via a wireless communication system upon actuation of the sensor.