Threat Exposure Management System for Dynamic Security Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cyber security systems struggle to maintain awareness of updates in mitigations, telemetry data, and detection logics, and prioritize actions based on threat exposure to the defended environment's security posture.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that stores threat information and organizational threat profiles, generates baseline exposure scores, weights them based on organizational profiles, and determines defense surface change commands to prioritize and manage cyber security operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional cyber security monitoring systems are used, then basic threat detection is possible, but the systems cannot maintain awareness of updates in mitigations, telemetry data, and detection logics, and cannot prioritize actions based on threat exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidawareness of updates
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the defense surface and updates threat exposure scores based on new telemetry data, mitigation updates, and detection logic changes. This feedback loop ensures the system maintains current awareness of security posture and automatically re-prioritizes threats based on updated information, resolving the contradiction between reliable situational awareness and adaptability to updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The threat exposure scoring system dynamically adjusts priorities based on changing threat landscapes, organizational profiles, and defense surface characteristics. Rather than static monitoring, the system continuously recalculates exposure scores as new information becomes available, enabling both reliable current-state awareness and adaptability to ongoing updates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If comprehensive threat monitoring is implemented, then complete security coverage is achieved, but the complexity of managing and prioritizing multiple threats increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms complex multi-dimensional threat data into simplified priority metrics through exposure scoring. By changing parameters from raw threat data to normalized scores weighted by organizational profiles and defense surface characteristics, the system maintains comprehensive monitoring while reducing management complexity through automated prioritization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system segments the overall security posture into discrete defense surface components, each with its own threat exposure score. This segmentation allows comprehensive coverage to be broken down into manageable units that can be independently analyzed and prioritized, reducing overall management complexity while maintaining complete security coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If manual threat prioritization is performed, then detailed analysis is possible, but the speed and efficiency of security operations deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat analysis precisionVSAvoidsecurity operation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual mechanical prioritization processes with automated computational algorithms that calculate threat exposure scores. This substitution maintains precise threat analysis through systematic evaluation of multiple factors while dramatically increasing security operation speed by eliminating manual intervention in the prioritization process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The threat prioritization system performs self-service by automatically analyzing threats, calculating exposure scores, and generating prioritized action recommendations without requiring manual analyst intervention. This maintains precise analysis through automated algorithms while maximizing productivity by enabling rapid, continuous prioritization of security operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12309186B2Systems and methods for continuous threat-informed exposure management
Publication Date: 2025.05.20 CYBERPROOF INC
  • US12309186B2 patent drawing
  • US12309186B2 patent drawing
  • US12309186B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the subject technology relate to determining a defense surface change command to be applied to a defense surface. An organizational threat profile is stored and a baseline exposure score for threats is generated. The baseline exposure score is weighted based on at least the organizational threat profile to generate a prioritized exposure score. A defense surface change command is generated based on at least the prioritized exposure score, which is transmitted to hardware or software components, and an updated prioritized exposure score for the one or more hardware or software components is generated.