Threat Management System Using ML Clustering for Dynamic Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer security systems rely on rule-based, reactive approaches that are ineffective in dynamically changing environments, failing to timely detect and mitigate cyber threats, and often result in false positives that disrupt legitimate users.

Innovation Solution

A threat management system utilizing a machine learning model that collects features to determine threat types through clustering, enabling proactive and dynamic threat detection, minimizing processing power, and allowing for timely actions to be taken against detected threats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rule-based threshold systems are used to detect attacks, then the system is simple to implement, but it produces false positives that disrupt legitimate users and cannot adapt to dynamically changing threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to changing threatsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rule-based mechanical threshold systems with a machine learning model that performs clustering analysis. Instead of using fixed rules to detect attacks, the system uses unsupervised learning algorithms to automatically identify patterns and group access attempts by threat type, enabling adaptability to evolving threats without manual rule updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes from static threshold parameters to dynamic cluster-based parameters. The machine learning model continuously processes access attempt data and automatically adjusts clustering parameters based on observed patterns, allowing the system to adapt to new threat types and behaviors without requiring manual parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If predefined thresholds are used for failed login attempts, then the system requires minimal processing resources, but it cannot timely detect and mitigate sophisticated cyber threats

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection speedVSAvoidprocessing power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by performing clustering analysis only on access attempts that meet certain criteria or show suspicious patterns, rather than analyzing every single access attempt in detail. This selective approach maintains high detection speed while reducing overall processing power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is pre-trained on historical attack data before deployment. This preliminary training enables the system to quickly recognize and cluster new threats in real-time without requiring intensive processing during actual threat detection, as the clustering logic has already been learned during the training phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If simple threshold-based lockout is implemented, then the system is easy to operate, but it results in false positives that lock out legitimate users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces simple threshold-based detection with machine learning-based clustering analysis. The system automatically identifies threat types by grouping access attempts based on multiple features and patterns, significantly improving identification accuracy while reducing false positives that incorrectly flag legitimate users as threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive feature collection is performed for threat analysis, then the system achieves high accuracy in threat type determination, but it increases processing time and resource usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat type determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system collects and processes only the most relevant features for clustering analysis rather than analyzing all possible data points. The machine learning model is designed to work efficiently with a focused set of key features, maintaining high threat type determination accuracy while minimizing processing time and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11770409B2Intrusion management with threat type clustering
Publication Date: 2023.09.26 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11770409B2 patent drawing
  • US11770409B2 patent drawing
  • US11770409B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method, computer system, and computer program product for threat management. A set of features used by a machine learning model is collected by the computer system to determine a threat type for an access attempt when the access attempt is detected. A cluster is determined, by the machine learning model in the computer system, for the access attempt using the set of features, wherein the machine learning model implements clustering to determine the cluster for the access attempt, and wherein the cluster for the access attempt corresponds to the threat type for the access attempt. A set of actions is performed by the machine learning model in the computer system based on the threat type determined for the access attempt.