Three-Color Hardmask for Selective Fin Etching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In semiconductor fabrication, particularly for FinFETs, the selective removal of fins is challenging due to errors in edge placement and critical dimension, leading to damage or removal of neighboring fins during the lithographic process.

Innovation Solution

A three-color hardmask fin pattern is formed using self-assembled fins with selective etchability, allowing for the precise removal of one fin type without damaging nearby fins of different compositions, achieved through a process involving seed layers, directed self-assembly, and selective etching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional lithographic masking is used to remove fins, then the process is simple and fast, but edge placement errors and critical dimension errors cause neighboring fins to be damaged or removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin removal precisionVSAvoidhardmask structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the uniform hardmask structure into multiple segments with different materials (first hardmask material, second hardmask material, third hardmask material) arranged in alternating patterns. This segmentation allows selective etching of specific fin regions while protecting others, resolving the contradiction by enabling precise fin removal without damaging neighboring fins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different hardmask materials at different locations along the fin structure. The first hardmask material is used where fin removal is desired, while the second and third hardmask materials are used where fin protection is needed. This local differentiation of material properties enables precise spatial control over etching outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Length of moving object

If the lithographic process operates near its limit to achieve tighter pitch, then device scaling is improved, but masking errors increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefin pitchVSAvoidmasking accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent forms the multi-material hardmask structure before the fin etching process. By pre-establishing the alternating pattern of different hardmask materials that define where fins should be removed or protected, the process eliminates the need for precise lithographic masking at the final fin pitch, thereby resolving the contradiction between tight pitch and masking accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of manufacture

If a single hardmask material is used for fin formation, then the process is simple and fast, but selective removal of individual fins is not possible

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardmask fabrication simplicityVSAvoidfin selectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter of the hardmask from a single uniform material to multiple materials with different etch selectivities. This parameter change enables selective removal of fins by choosing appropriate etch conditions that preferentially remove one material over others, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and fin selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method ensures accurate and selective removal of fins, reducing errors and maintaining the integrity of neighboring fins, thereby improving the precision and reliability of fin formation in semiconductor fabrication.

Implementation Method 1

Self-assembled fins are formed by directed self-assembly on the seed layer fins

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDirected self-assembly: Self-Assembly

Implementation Method 2

The exposed fin of the first color is etched away with a selective etch that does not remove fins of a second color or a third color

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective etching:

Data Source

PatentUS11171002B2Alternating hardmasks for tight-pitch line formation
Publication Date: 2021.11.09 ADEIA SEMICONDUCTOR SOLUTIONS LLC
  • US11171002B2 patent drawing
  • US11171002B2 patent drawing
  • US11171002B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods of forming fins include masking a region on a three-color hardmask fin pattern, leaving a fin of a first color exposed. The exposed fin of the first color is etched away with a selective etch that does not remove fins of a second color or a third color. The mask and all fins of a second color are etched away. Fins are etched into a fin base layer using the fins of the first color and the fins of the third color.