Three-Door Lid Assembly for Multi-Function Dry Food Container Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dry food containers lack features that allow for efficient spooning, pouring, and sifting of contents, with inadequate sealing and opening mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A container with a three-door lid system, including a main door for spooning, a side door for pouring, and another side door for sifting, each with sealing mechanisms and snap connections, allowing for easy access and secure closure, and a tamper-proof seal for assurance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a single-door lid is used, then the structure is simple, but the container cannot efficiently support multiple access functions (spooning, pouring, sifting)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-function access capabilityVSAvoidlid structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lid is divided into three separate doors (main door, first side door, second side door) that can open independently. Each door serves a specific function: the main door for spooning, the first side door for pouring, and the second side door for sifting. This segmentation allows the container to support multiple access functions simultaneously while keeping each door's structure relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The lid assembly is designed as a universal multi-functional component that integrates three different access methods (spooning, pouring, sifting) into a single lid structure. The main door, first side door, and second side door collectively provide versatile access options for different usage scenarios, making the container adaptable to various needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple doors are added to the lid, then access functionality is improved, but the sealing reliability becomes more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess function varietyVSAvoidsealing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Each door is equipped with its own sealing bead (main door sealing bead, first side door sealing bead, second side door sealing bead) positioned at the specific location where sealing is needed. This local sealing approach ensures that each door maintains reliable sealing independently when closed, while still allowing the other doors to function. The sealing beads are integrated into the respective doors rather than using a single complex sealing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If a secure seal is implemented, then content freshness is maintained, but the ease of opening the container is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseal securityVSAvoidopening ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lid is segmented into three independently hinged doors rather than a single sealed unit. This allows users to open only the specific door needed for the current task (spooning, pouring, or sifting) while the other doors remain securely closed. The segmentation reduces the effort required to access contents compared to opening an entire sealed lid, while maintaining security through the closed doors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each door is designed with a hinge mechanism that allows dynamic opening and closing. The doors can be opened individually as needed and closed securely when not in use. This dynamic design provides ease of operation for frequent access while maintaining seal security when doors are closed, as each door can be opened independently without requiring force to break a complete seal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If the main door has a larger cross-sectional area than the rim, then spooning access is improved, but the lid base stability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespooning accessVSAvoidlid base stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The main door is designed with a larger cross-sectional area than the rim of the container body to provide adequate opening for spooning access. This local expansion at the door area does not compromise the overall lid base stability because the lid base itself maintains its structural integrity and connection to the container body. The larger door area is a localized feature that serves the specific function of spooning without affecting the global stability of the lid assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10441101B2Three door lid and container utilizing the same
Publication Date: 2019.10.15 MCCORMICK & CO INC
  • US10441101B2 patent drawing
  • US10441101B2 patent drawing
  • US10441101B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Container having a container body comprising a bottom, a rim and a lid securing portion located adjacent the rim. A lid includes a lid base sized and configured to secure the lid to the lid securing portion of the container body and a lid door assembly movably mounted to the lid base. The lid door assembly includes a main door that can assume at least a closed position with respect to the lid base and an open position with respect to the lid base, a first side door that can assume at least a closed position with respect to the main door and an open position with respect to the main door, and a second side door that can assume at least a closed position with respect to the main door and an open position with respect to the main door.