Three-Mask Microfabrication for Integrated Gas Chromatography

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The integration of microfabricated components in gas chromatography systems is hindered by the complexity and cost of disparate fabrication processes, lacking a stackable or monolithic approach that would simplify manufacturability and integration.

Innovation Solution

A method for fabricating a gas chromatograph system using a three-mask microfabrication process, where each mask is used for distinct steps such as metal deposition, cavity formation, and through-hole creation, allowing for the assembly of components like pumps, separation columns, and detectors on separate substrates and stacking them for a compact, integrated design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If disparate microfabrication processes are used for each component, then each component can be optimally designed and fabricated, but the complexity and cost of fabricating the whole system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent fabrication qualityVSAvoidsystem fabrication complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple disparate microfabrication processes into a unified fabrication approach where pump, preconcentrator, column, and detector components are fabricated using the same set of three masks and compatible processes, reducing system fabrication complexity while maintaining component quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates universal fabrication masks that serve multiple functions across different component types. The same three masks are used to define features for pumps, preconcentrators, columns, and detectors, making the fabrication process universally applicable to all components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If disparate microfabrication processes are used for each component, then each component can be optimally designed and fabricated, but the cost of fabricating the whole system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent fabrication qualityVSAvoidsystem fabrication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple component fabrications into a single cost structure by using the same three masks and fabrication processes for all components, eliminating the need for separate expensive fabrication runs for each component type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The universal masks serve multiple components simultaneously, reducing the total number of masks and fabrication steps required, thereby lowering the overall manufacturing cost of the integrated system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If a stackable architecture or monolithic process is used, then manufacturability and integration are greatly benefited, but the fabrication process becomes more constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integration easeVSAvoidfabrication process flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the integrated system into distinct functional components (pump, preconcentrator, column, detector) that can be independently designed and optimized, then fabricated together using a unified process, maintaining design flexibility within the constrained stackable architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from planar fabrication to three-dimensional stacking, where components are fabricated on separate layers and then vertically integrated. This dimensional change enables stackable architecture benefits while preserving fabrication flexibility through layer-independent design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS10132783B2Integrated fluidic system for gas chromatography
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • US10132783B2 patent drawing
  • US10132783B2 patent drawing
  • US10132783B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is presented for fabricating a fluidic system for a gas chromatograph. The method includes: microfabricating a portion of a fluidic system of a gas chromatograph on a substrate using a first mask; microfabricating a portion of the fluidic system of the gas chromatograph using a second mask; and microfabricating a portion of the fluidic system of the gas chromatograph using a third mask, such that the first mask, the second mask and the third mask are different from each other and the microfabricating of the fluidic system of the gas chromatograph is completed using only the first, second and third masks. A gas chromatograph wherein a microfabricated Knudsen pump is arranged to operate in a first direction to draw carrier gas into a preconcentrator and in a second direction to draw gas out of the preconcentrator.