Three-Phase PPP Inverter Using Stacked DAHB Soft-Switching Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing partial power processing (PPP) converters face limitations in AC systems, particularly in maintaining efficiency and soft-switching capabilities when interfacing with AC grids, and are often restricted to two-stage inverters.

Innovation Solution

A three-phase PPP inverter framework using stacked dual-active-half-bridge (DAHB) circuits with dynamic switching frequency control maintains soft-switching over the grid cycle, improving efficiency and power density by processing less power internally.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional full power processing (FPP) converters are used in AC systems, then complete power conversion is achieved, but efficiency is reduced due to processing all power internally

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion efficiencyVSAvoidpower processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The power processing function is segmented into two paths: a processed power path through the DAHB converter and a direct power path bypassing the converter. This segmentation allows only the necessary portion of power to be processed internally, improving efficiency while maintaining complete power delivery to the AC grid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing all power through the converter, the system applies partial power processing where only a portion of the total power undergoes conversion. The voltage conversion ratio is leveraged to determine the optimal processed power portion, reducing converter losses while ensuring complete power delivery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Power

If switching frequency is increased to improve power density, then converter size is reduced, but soft-switching capability is lost leading to increased losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower densityVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The switching frequency is made dynamic rather than fixed, allowing the system to adapt the frequency based on operating conditions. The controller adjusts the switching frequency to maintain soft-switching operation across varying power levels and voltage conversion ratios, minimizing switching losses while maximizing power density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the switching frequency parameter dynamically to maintain optimal operation. By adjusting this key parameter based on real-time conditions, the system preserves soft-switching capability across the full operating range, reducing energy losses while maintaining high power density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of energy

If voltage conversion ratio is increased to improve power processing efficiency, then less power needs to be processed, but the operating range becomes more limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing lossesVSAvoidvoltage conversion range
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The voltage conversion ratio is made dynamic, allowing the system to adjust the conversion ratio based on the specific operating conditions and grid requirements. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to optimize processing efficiency for each operating point while maintaining adaptability across a wide voltage conversion range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The DAHB converter topology provides multi-functionality by operating effectively across a wide range of voltage conversion ratios. The converter can adapt its operation to serve different voltage levels and power requirements, maintaining efficiency while providing broad adaptability to various AC grid conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If hard-switching operation is used to simplify control, then control complexity is reduced, but efficiency deteriorates due to higher switching losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol complexityVSAvoidswitching losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The control system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor operating conditions and adjust switching signals accordingly. This feedback enables the system to maintain soft-switching operation by detecting when switching conditions are optimal and adjusting the timing to preserve zero-voltage or zero-current switching, reducing losses while managing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system prepares the switching devices for soft-switching operation by pre-charging or pre-discharging switching nodes before the actual switching event. This preliminary action ensures that switches transition at optimal moments, enabling soft-switching without requiring complex real-time control adjustments during the switching event itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250385618A1Systems and Methods for a Three-Phase Partial Power Processing Inverter
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIV IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • US20250385618A1 patent drawing
  • US20250385618A1 patent drawing
  • US20250385618A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are systems, method, devices, and other implementations, including a voltage inverter system that includes multiple modular phase circuits to invert DC voltage into a multiple phase AC output voltage provided to an electrical grid, with each of the modular phase circuits including a reconfigured stacked dual-active-half-bridge (DAHB) circuit folded across a galvanic isolation between a primary side and a secondary side of the DAHB to stack the primary side in series with the secondary side, and one or more controllers to control electrical operation of the multiple modular phase circuits. In some embodiments, the reconfigured stacked DAHB circuits of the multiple modular phase circuits may be configured to perform partial power processing. In some examples, the controllers can be configured to maintain soft-switching operations for switching devices coupled to capacitors of the stacked DAHB circuits, or maintain substantially constant switching frequencies for the stacked DAHB circuits.